Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pmem2_mem_ext TEST5,6 #6129

Open
osalyk opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

pmem2_mem_ext TEST5,6 #6129

osalyk opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
CI: Disabled Temporarily disabled from testing libpmem2 libpmem- and libpmem2-related Priority: 4 low Type: External Bug A bug not in PMDK

Comments

@osalyk
Copy link
Contributor

osalyk commented Nov 19, 2024

Environment Information

  • Platform: ACY

Please provide a reproduction of the bug:

https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/actions/runs/11898534398/job/33155251015#step:4:1093

Tests failed, but were skipped in previous runs.
https://github.com/pmem/pmdk/actions/runs/11872226030/job/33085690634#step:4:1121
@osalyk osalyk added libpmem2 libpmem- and libpmem2-related Type: Bug A previously unknown bug in PMDK labels Nov 19, 2024
@osalyk osalyk mentioned this issue Nov 20, 2024
Merged
@janekmi
Copy link
Contributor

janekmi commented Jan 8, 2025

Despite the system supports movdir64b. The library when run under Valgrind reports movdir64b is not supported:

<libpmem2>: <4> [cpu.c:187 is_cpu_movdir64b_present] movdir64b not supported

@janekmi janekmi added Priority: 4 low Type: External Bug A bug not in PMDK CI: Disabled Temporarily disabled from testing and removed Priority: 2 high Type: Bug A previously unknown bug in PMDK DAOS DAOS-related labels Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
CI: Disabled Temporarily disabled from testing libpmem2 libpmem- and libpmem2-related Priority: 4 low Type: External Bug A bug not in PMDK
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@grom72 @janekmi @osalyk