You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we discussed that before. I would argue the opposite way: None means not specified -> let mindist decide what do to. an empty list [] would be explicitly setting there are no permutations. I agree that None could be ambiguous, but i think [] is more intuitive for no permutatons?
That's what we decided before, but I'm changing my mind. It just seems so counterintuitive to have permlist==None mean that all atoms are permutable. Especially when a completely homogeneous system is not really all that common.
On 20 Aug 2013, at 18:35, ruehle wrote:
I think we discussed that before. I would argue the opposite way: None means not specified -> let mindist decide what do to. an empty list [] would be explicitly setting there are no permutations. I agree that None could be ambiguous, but i think [] is more intuitive for no permutatons?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
I think if permlist is None it assumes that all the atoms are permutable. this is unintuitive and should probably be changed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: