You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we run the gget opentargets -r diseases we get a score but if you go to the opentargets view for the same ensemble ID you get a table with a number of scores -- it is not clear two things:
it isn't your fault it seems but OpenTargets reports an EFO measurement as a disease -- for example if you use LILRA4 you will see there is an score of 0.34 which appears to be the association score
{
"id":"EFO_0007937",
"name":"blood protein measurement",
"description":"quantification of the levels of some protein in a blood sample",
"score":0.3370941177
}
EFO is not the OBO foundry's ontology for disease -- but a measurement - which it confirms - which if you dig you see is the measurement of the LILRA4 protein in the blood and if you look at the table you see in (opentargets disease associations)[https://platform.opentargets.org/target/ENSG00000239961/associations] there are animal model evidence for mondo diseases that have a weak association score but a pretty good (0.48) score on the animal model for a MONDO termed disease.
but the issue is that though opentargets returns this - should you as the creator of this tool prevent non Mondo terms from presenting themselves as a disease?
Looking at the webpage it seems we should adjust this call to allow a user to choose which of the 23 terms to choose evidence for -- so I guess this becomes a feature request.
{
"id":"EFO_0007937",
"name":"blood protein measurement",
"description":"quantification of the levels of some protein in a blood sample",
"score":0.3370941177
},
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What happened?
When we run the gget opentargets -r diseases we get a score but if you go to the opentargets view for the same ensemble ID you get a table with a number of scores -- it is not clear two things:
returns
EFO is not the OBO foundry's ontology for disease -- but a measurement - which it confirms - which if you dig you see is the measurement of the LILRA4 protein in the blood and if you look at the table you see in (opentargets disease associations)[https://platform.opentargets.org/target/ENSG00000239961/associations] there are animal model evidence for mondo diseases that have a weak association score but a pretty good (0.48) score on the animal model for a MONDO termed disease.
but the issue is that though opentargets returns this - should you as the creator of this tool prevent non Mondo terms from presenting themselves as a disease?
gget version
gget version: 0.29.0
Operating System (OS)
macOS
User interface
Command-line
Are you using a computer with an Apple M1 chip?
Not applicable
What is the exact command that was run?
Which output/error did you get?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: