-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Building and publishing API docs #219
Comments
Sorry for the late reply; i'm sure i had replied to that already but seems it didn't go through. SO here it is again: For some other projects in the past I've used DoxyGen; and in that process got used to writing comments in that style - getting a project "really" usefully documented with these tools is a bit more work than just the function (and maybe \file) comments, but at least it's a start. I haven't really started on working on that "more complete doxygen-style documentations"-task for owl, yet, but yes, that's where it's eventually supposed to go (BTW I don't know 'qdoc', but assume it's something similar). |
No worries, and thanks for taking the time to answer it (twice!). I'll try to take a closer look at it this or next week. The reason I mentioned |
I created a close-to-default Doxyfile, and added auto-deployment via GitHub Pages on my fork: The patch: If you have any feedback, I'd be happy to take it. |
Just a gentle ping here, @ingowald: do you have any thoughts on deploying Doxygen for OWL as shown above? |
I noticed many function-level comments start with
/*!
, which suggests that they're written withqdoc
in mind. Unless I'm missing it, there's no publicly available instance of the generated API docs. It'd make sense to generate and host them under https://owl-project.github.io/ perhaps?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: