Replies: 1 comment
-
|
awesome |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since the protocol owned liquidity started becoming a norm now, it aligned with one of the ideas we were discussing internally.
For providing liquidity, till now we are depositing in LPs. All the swap mechanisms works with Pool's logic internally. For that, each DEX needs to fight to get liquidity by providing better incentives for token holders/liquidity providers. On the other hand, liquidity providers need to chose between the different protocols for providing their liquidity.
But think about solving this UX issue by enabling chain-owned liquidity solution.
For example, cosmoshub will have a global ATOM Pool and pairing tokens. Something like this,
The data storage will be something like this always summing to 100%
The new ibc-app enables two way control (extended ICA but controlled by governance), or even we can utilize current ICA on different chains to access a portion of the liquidity on the CosmosHub (and such that any network).
The protocols such as Osmosis, will have access to the liquidity on CosmosHub. Whenever there's a swap/lending request on Osmosis,
it will utilize required ATOM from the UnifiedPool from CosmosHub. This basically solves 2 problems.
all the providers/gov on the hub. This allows LP providers to share the equal swap-fees so it solves
the knowledge problem for LP providers.
protocols such as Osmosis, Neutron)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions