You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way I understand it, a border allows routing packets from an ethernet network to a thread network by bridging the two.
Following that logic, I have a question about two different Thread partitions:
A thread device sends a packet from Thread partition A, addressing a device inside partition B.
The border router from A should forward the packet to the connecting Ethernet network, where it should get routed to Border router B, and then to the device inside B.
So, according to my logic, a BBR should not be needed, since both border routers (A and B) handle the briding automatically, right?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
The way I understand it, a border allows routing packets from an ethernet network to a thread network by bridging the two.
Following that logic, I have a question about two different Thread partitions:
A thread device sends a packet from Thread partition A, addressing a device inside partition B.
The border router from A should forward the packet to the connecting Ethernet network, where it should get routed to Border router B, and then to the device inside B.
So, according to my logic, a BBR should not be needed, since both border routers (A and B) handle the briding automatically, right?
What benefits would a BBR bring in that case?
Thanks for your time!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions