Dual Enrollment + LIF: What Problem Are You Actually Trying to Solve?

[kelhoyland]

This discussion is meant to ground LIF’s dual enrollment work in real problems, not abstractions.

If you’re here because of dual enrollment—whether from K–12, higher ed, state systems, or technology vendors—we’d love to hear what you are trying to solve.

You do not need to be an expert in LIF to participate.

What We’re Curious About

• Where does dual enrollment data break down today?
• What learner information is hardest to move, trust, or reuse?
• Who bears the burden when systems don’t align (learners, institutions, states)?

Share From Your Experience

Any of the following are helpful:

• A concrete example that didn’t work
• A data handoff that required manual cleanup
• A policy or reporting requirement that current systems struggle to meet
• Something you wish you could see in one place but can’t today

What This Discussion Will Inform

Your input will help shape:

• What data LIF should prioritize for dual enrollment
• What not to over-engineer
• Where LIF should stop and other systems should take over

If you’re unsure how LIF fits yet, that’s completely fine—questions are contributions here.