Connects an issue/PR with a particular user persona.
Connects an issue/PR with a particular user persona.
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a feature/enhancement marked for deprecation.
Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to human interaction and experience.
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Connects an issue/PR with a particular user persona.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to governance.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to a handbook.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to marketing.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to metrics.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to project news and outreach.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to onboarding.
Connects an issue/PR with a particular user persona.
Categorizes issue or PR as a support question.
Indicates an issue/PR is related to Special Interest Groups (SIGs)
Issues that clearly identify an actionable task, scoped appropriately.
Connects an issue/PR with a particular user persona.
Categorizes an issue as capturing a user story
Indicates an issue/PR is related to project web presence.
Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor.
Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test.
Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done.
Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now.