Skip to content

Conversation

@cybertron
Copy link
Member

We have a bug where misbehaved clients are exhausting the connection limits by starting a connection and abandoning it before it is even established. Setting the client-fin timeout is a recommended option to address this sort of situation. This patch also sets server-fin in the interest of symmetry and avoiding any similar issues on the server side.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

We have a bug where misbehaved clients are exhausting the connection
limits by starting a connection and abandoning it before it is even
established. Setting the client-fin timeout is a recommended option
to address this sort of situation. This patch also sets server-fin
in the interest of symmetry and avoiding any similar issues on the
server side.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cybertron: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62232, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

We have a bug where misbehaved clients are exhausting the connection limits by starting a connection and abandoning it before it is even established. Setting the client-fin timeout is a recommended option to address this sort of situation. This patch also sets server-fin in the interest of symmetry and avoiding any similar issues on the server side.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2025

@cybertron: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change a55feb4 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit a55feb4 link false /test bootstrap-unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-mco-disruptive a55feb4 link false /test e2e-aws-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn a55feb4 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4 a55feb4 link false /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive a55feb4 link false /test e2e-gcp-mco-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl a55feb4 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows a55feb4 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-windows
ci/prow/e2e-openstack a55feb4 link false /test e2e-openstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cybertron: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62232, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @rbbratta

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by @rbbratta

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rbbratta: This PR has been marked as verified by @rbbratta.

In response to this:

/verified by @rbbratta

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2025
@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required
/assign @pablintino

Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logically looks sane to me

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron, rbbratta, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e5aab2c and 2 for PR HEAD a55feb4 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4a3b43b into openshift:main Nov 22, 2025
14 of 23 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cybertron: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62232
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62232 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

In response to this:

We have a bug where misbehaved clients are exhausting the connection limits by starting a connection and abandoning it before it is even established. Setting the client-fin timeout is a recommended option to address this sort of situation. This patch also sets server-fin in the interest of symmetry and avoiding any similar issues on the server side.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-11-22-193140

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.20 release-4.19 release-4.18 release-4.17

These are the versions requested on the bug. We can go further if needed.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cybertron: new pull request created: #5459

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20 release-4.19 release-4.18 release-4.17

These are the versions requested on the bug. We can go further if needed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release 4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cybertron: cannot checkout release: error checking out "release": exit status 1 error: pathspec 'release' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release 4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cybertron: cannot checkout release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17: error checking out "release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17": exit status 1 error: pathspec 'release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/jira backport release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cybertron: Missing required branches for backport chain:

  • openshift-4.20 OR release-4.20,

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.19,release-4.18,release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

/cherrypick release-4.19 release-4.18 release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@cybertron: new pull request created: #5461

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.19 release-4.18 release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@cybertron
Copy link
Member Author

Ugh, okay, the first command actually did the right thing. I just forgot that it doesn't propose all of the patches at once.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants