Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "tool compatibility" page #39

Open
gtfierro opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Add "tool compatibility" page #39

gtfierro opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@gtfierro
Copy link
Contributor

From a review comment on 223. We should create a new page with these pieces of information available:

The 223 standard uses SHACL to precisely determine the intended (and enforced) graph structure, for example valid relationships among s223 classes. These may not be interpreted by modeling tools such as Stardog Explorer which rely on an explicit statement of classes a property applies to (domain) and its value set (range). In order to prevent unintended inferences the schema.org predicates domainIncludes and rangeIncludes are preferred to define the property domain and range, potentially converting them from SHACL, for example:

construct      
?property  <https://schema.org/domainIncludes> ?domain ;         
                  <https://schema.org/rangeIncludes> ?range ;     .     
}
where{ 
     ?domain a s223:Class ;         
      sh:property [
              sh:path ?property ;
             sh:qualifiedValueShape [ sh:class ?range ]
     ]
}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant