Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is Omegaconf maintained? #1200

Open
astrojuanlu opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Is Omegaconf maintained? #1200

astrojuanlu opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@astrojuanlu
Copy link

First of all, thanks for creating and maintaining Omegaconf all these years 🙏🏼

I've been following this repo closely for the past few months, especially after we started hitting #1000. There's a couple of issues asking for a new stable release (#1158, #1185) and nothing has been said so far.

I notice that @omry, creator of the project, has moved on. @Jasha10, who has been maintaining Omegaconf in the past few months, is still reviewing PRs, but seemingly doesn't have much time for the project lately.

For the record, Omegaconf seems to still be in use in Hydra, the sister project, but equally there are no news about release dates yet.

About other products coming out of Facebook Research, I notice that fairseq2 is supposed to replace fairseq, and the newest version doesn't use Omegaconf (yet).

I'd like to ask what are the plans for the future, and whether the maintainers need help bringing the project forward.

Full disclosure: I'm the PM for https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro/, which uses Omegaconf heavily.

@astrojuanlu
Copy link
Author

astrojuanlu commented Jan 9, 2025

Good to see that Python 3.13 support is in the works #1201 and that there have been recent commits to main #1202 #1203 #1204

I will close this issue myself when (and if) there's a new release :) otherwise maintainers feel free to do so earlier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant