Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Point Cloud Clustering Issues #549

Open
DuVogel87 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Point Cloud Clustering Issues #549

DuVogel87 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@DuVogel87
Copy link

Here is a problem I am facing. I am trying to figure out why Splatica achieves better results from the same dataset than I currently can. I use GSplat for training and have used Metashape and Colmap for structure-from-motion (SFM).

The images I am sharing include a screenshot from Splatica and one from GSplat. They show that the "point cloud" in Splatica appears to be much more evenly distributed compared to what I get from my Colmap/Metashape input.

I took some screenshots of the final Gaussians inside Supersplat and enabled the "points" view. It seems that in my point cloud, a certain pattern is visible where many points cluster together, followed by empty spaces, and then clustering again.

I currently believe this issue is not related to the SFM process because within the Colmap and Metashape GUIs, the point cloud looks more evenly distributed. Instead, I suspect it has something to do with the training process, and I wonder if anyone has insights into what might be causing this and how I can achieve a more evenly distributed point cloud.

I have attached two images for reference. The first image is the Splatica and the second image the Gsplat model within Supersplat.

Image
Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant