You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here is a problem I am facing. I am trying to figure out why Splatica achieves better results from the same dataset than I currently can. I use GSplat for training and have used Metashape and Colmap for structure-from-motion (SFM).
The images I am sharing include a screenshot from Splatica and one from GSplat. They show that the "point cloud" in Splatica appears to be much more evenly distributed compared to what I get from my Colmap/Metashape input.
I took some screenshots of the final Gaussians inside Supersplat and enabled the "points" view. It seems that in my point cloud, a certain pattern is visible where many points cluster together, followed by empty spaces, and then clustering again.
I currently believe this issue is not related to the SFM process because within the Colmap and Metashape GUIs, the point cloud looks more evenly distributed. Instead, I suspect it has something to do with the training process, and I wonder if anyone has insights into what might be causing this and how I can achieve a more evenly distributed point cloud.
I have attached two images for reference. The first image is the Splatica and the second image the Gsplat model within Supersplat.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Here is a problem I am facing. I am trying to figure out why Splatica achieves better results from the same dataset than I currently can. I use GSplat for training and have used Metashape and Colmap for structure-from-motion (SFM).
The images I am sharing include a screenshot from Splatica and one from GSplat. They show that the "point cloud" in Splatica appears to be much more evenly distributed compared to what I get from my Colmap/Metashape input.
I took some screenshots of the final Gaussians inside Supersplat and enabled the "points" view. It seems that in my point cloud, a certain pattern is visible where many points cluster together, followed by empty spaces, and then clustering again.
I currently believe this issue is not related to the SFM process because within the Colmap and Metashape GUIs, the point cloud looks more evenly distributed. Instead, I suspect it has something to do with the training process, and I wonder if anyone has insights into what might be causing this and how I can achieve a more evenly distributed point cloud.
I have attached two images for reference. The first image is the Splatica and the second image the Gsplat model within Supersplat.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: