Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider sp-repo-review #349

Open
nathanjmcdougall opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Consider sp-repo-review #349

nathanjmcdougall opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nathanjmcdougall
Copy link
Owner

Motivation
https://github.com/scientific-python/cookie?tab=readme-ov-file#sp-repo-review

This looks quite nice, providing higher-level guidance than ruff.

This is also related to #113.

This might help inform the way we consider #306.

Summary of desired enhancement
Consider whether we want to use this pre-commit somehow.

@nathanjmcdougall nathanjmcdougall added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 26, 2025
@nathanjmcdougall nathanjmcdougall self-assigned this Feb 26, 2025
@nathanjmcdougall
Copy link
Owner Author

It's not possible to ignore particular rules (yet), so this could come across as quite overwhelming.

Some super useful ideas here though - which should be unpacked as individual issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant