From dc178feb239c8a0301291776d62f643bd1f0968d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Nottingham Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:03:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add explanation of intent --- draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md b/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md index 1c28cc08..4c439222 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md +++ b/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Some formats are interoperable (i.e., they are supported by more than one implem - There is no conflict with IETF work or work at other recognised SDOs (present or future) - There is evidence of broad adoption -The Designated Expert(s) have discretion in applying these criteria; in rare cases, they might judge it best to register an entry that fails one or more. +The intent is to assure that successfully deployed community formats have registered media types. As such, the criteria are designed to preclude anticipatory registrations. The Designated Expert(s) have discretion in applying these criteria; in rare cases, they might judge it best to register an entry that fails one or more. Note that such registrations still go through preliminary community review (Section 5.1), and decisions can be appealed (Section 5.3). From 39700a8f8b4c14edbea134c4c4721bc79d09339e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Nottingham Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:06:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md --- draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md b/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md index 4c439222..871fcd00 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md +++ b/draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree.md @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Some formats are interoperable (i.e., they are supported by more than one implem - There is no conflict with IETF work or work at other recognised SDOs (present or future) - There is evidence of broad adoption -The intent is to assure that successfully deployed community formats have registered media types. As such, the criteria are designed to preclude anticipatory registrations. The Designated Expert(s) have discretion in applying these criteria; in rare cases, they might judge it best to register an entry that fails one or more. +The intent is to assure that successfully deployed community formats have registered media types. As such, the criteria are designed to preclude anticipatory registrations. The Designated Expert(s) have discretion in applying these criteria; in rare cases, they might judge it best to register an entry that fails one or more. Note that such registrations still go through preliminary community review (Section 5.1), and decisions can be appealed (Section 5.3).