-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
Fix SingleStream and MultiStream reciprocal score comparison for TEST04 #1491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sahelib25
wants to merge
5
commits into
mlcommons:master
Choose a base branch
from
krai:fix_test04
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c0c96f8
Fix SingleStream and MultiStream reciprocal score comparison for TEST04.
sahelib25 b40a42c
Merge branch 'master' into fix_test04
sahelib25 2a0aeb2
Merge branch 'master' into fix_test04
sahelib25 7694c10
[Automated Commit] Format Codebase
mlcommons-bot c92fc10
Merge branch 'master' into fix_test04
sahelib25 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change can potentially break the below check as the check assumes throughput metric for all the scenarios.
https://github.com/mlcommons/inference/pull/1491/files#diff-5c101fd75c9062a7dec72722d5f4aafe66e7d55fbc32f97378b74c08034c272cR141
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potentially, but why a similar approach (of not using reciprocals) does not cause any issue for TEST01 and TEST05?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TEST01 is doing comparison like this - both upper and lower bounds are checked and so we don't need reciprocal but the check is stricter than required.
TEST05 also had a similar check but was removed in a PR before 3.1 and so is currently broken for the offline scenario. This PR should fix that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the TEST05-related PR has been merged, should we do TEST04 in the same way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks fine to me. But I don't know the full reasoning behind taking this reciprocal. @nv-ananjappa any suggestions here?