Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Landing page copy (text) and layout are off #108

Closed
vfonic opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Landing page copy (text) and layout are off #108

vfonic opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@vfonic
Copy link

vfonic commented Jan 3, 2025

I noticed a few issues with the design of your landing page. I came to comment here so your product can shine, not to bash at it. I really hope this and similar projects become more successful! Thank you for your work so far!

Just a quick tip that I noticed when I visited the homepage:

Are looking for a something similar to the
Wordpress Elementor plugin but in Ruby on Rails?

This is not correct English. Please proofread or run it through ChatGPT which can fix the grammar.

Here's what I got

Please fix English grammar for this software product headline:
Embed a page builder into your Ruby on Rails app
Are looking for a something similar to the Wordpress Elementor plugin but in Ruby on Rails?
Your search is now over!

Let me help fix the grammar in this software product headline and text. Here's the corrected version:

Embed a page builder into your Ruby on Rails app

Are you looking for something similar to the WordPress Elementor plugin but for Ruby on Rails?
Your search is now over!

The corrections made:

  1. Added missing "you" in "Are you looking..."
  2. Removed the extra "a" before "something"
  3. Corrected "Wordpress" to "WordPress" (proper capitalization)
  4. Changed "but in Ruby" to "but for Ruby" for better phrasing

The corrected version flows better and maintains proper grammar while keeping the original message intact.

Since there are 4 errors in that one sentence, I'd highly recommend you run all of your text through some proofreading tool or a professional.

Also, this section header and below text are not centered (because the header div and the text div are not the same width)

.prose class from Tailwind adds max-width: 65ch which messes up the design

Screenshot 2025-01-02 at 21 30 05

Why do the images have a "snappify.io" watermark? It makes the product feel cheaper. Even if snappify.io was one of your products, which it doesn't seem to be.
You can just add an extra line to the bottom of the code snippet (and just use a default image editing tool that comes with your OS) and remove that extra line along with the snappify.io watermark. Or just use any other tool that offers beautiful code screenshots without the watermark.

Same as above, this is also not aligned

Screenshot 2025-01-02 at 21 34 01

You could also hire a designer to give you some feedback.

@did
Copy link
Contributor

did commented Jan 9, 2025

👋 @vfonic, thanks a lot for your feedback. You're absolutely right, I should have proofread it (which I usually do).
Ok, so I told ChatGPT to rewrite all the text and I fixed the stuff you mentioned.

I had put bigger effort to the MaglevPRO website (https://pro.maglev.dev) :-)

Thanks again!

@did did closed this as completed Jan 9, 2025
@did did added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 9, 2025
@vfonic
Copy link
Author

vfonic commented Jan 9, 2025

MaglevPRO looks awesome! 🔥

I'd recommend to merge the two websites on a single domain. Right now they are both competing for their SEO score. Instead of having for example 700 SEO score, they each have 350. (I'm just making up random numbers to make it make more sense. We're all just guessing how SEO works.)

On maglev.dev there's still this last one bit of "prose" left unaligned:
Screenshot 2025-01-09 at 09 07 34

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants