Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[subclass 1] sample sysref, LMFC, align ILAS to sysref #5

Open
jordens opened this issue Oct 14, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

[subclass 1] sample sysref, LMFC, align ILAS to sysref #5

jordens opened this issue Oct 14, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@jordens
Copy link
Member

jordens commented Oct 14, 2016

No description provided.

@jbqubit
Copy link

jbqubit commented Jun 8, 2017

I see that JESD204B Subclass 1 is not yet supported. Subclass 1 is part of the planned Sayma synchronization plan: "Timestamping a certain sample to a specific RTIO cycle requires two things in addition to JESD204B subclass 1 deterministic latency."

Some questions.

  • What is the status of Subclass 1 support?
  • What are the implications of the current status of this codebase for testing the Sayma hardware? In particular we want to check the following.
    • Phase synchronous operation of:
      • DACs on a single Sayma
      • DACs on different Sayma (but in same microTCA chassis).
    • Deterministic phase offset between power cycles for:
      • DACs on a single Sayma
      • DACs on different Sayma (but in same microTCA chassis).

@jbqubit
Copy link

jbqubit commented Jun 8, 2017

I looked at my notes... I see from quote Q0059 that JESD204B Subclass 1 is slated for delivery +1 moth after the Sayma prototype hardware is available. I've updated my questions slightly to reflect this.

@sbourdeauducq
Copy link
Member

Currently there is no support for it; it depends on what clock chip (e.g. HMC7043) is used, and we need hardware to develop it.

@jbqubit
Copy link

jbqubit commented Jul 25, 2017

@sbourdeauducq This should be part of milestone 4.0. I think it just got missed in the Sayma Issue sweep.
https://github.com/m-labs/artiq/milestone/11

@sbourdeauducq
Copy link
Member

You are in the wrong repository, the corresponding ARTIQ issue is m-labs/artiq#794 (and m-labs/artiq#795 for inter-card)

@jbqubit
Copy link

jbqubit commented Jul 25, 2017

Great! Thanks.

@sbourdeauducq
Copy link
Member

@enjoy-digital This is done, isn't it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants