You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially for the "Days of the Week" chart it helps a lot more to see relative data than absolute numbers, because doing X on 70 Tuesdays might be a lot if only 80 Tuesdays passed or might be the opposite if instead 300 Tuesdays passed.
So I'd like to see a toggle to switch between absolute and relative display in the charts. Would you be interested in adding something like this? If so, I would look into it and add PR a couple weeks down the road.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the weekdays chart, I support the idea. There I would even prefer to show percentages without the ability to switch. For the other charts, it is quite unclear what percentage should mean (percentage of total ticks?, percentage of ticks in the visible time frame?, ...), so in order to avoid confusion I would keep the other charts as they are. What do you think?
I would appreciate a PR for percentage display in the weekdays chart.
For, say the weekly display, I would have used 7 as a base, for months 31/30 and so on. So you always get the average number of ticks per day, but it's not as straightforward as for the weekdays, that's true and since the numbers are a lot smaller there anyway, it's not that important actually.
But I will look into the weekdays first and maybe we can take it from there.
cipo7741
added a commit
to cipo7741/tickmate
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2021
Especially for the "Days of the Week" chart it helps a lot more to see relative data than absolute numbers, because doing X on 70 Tuesdays might be a lot if only 80 Tuesdays passed or might be the opposite if instead 300 Tuesdays passed.
So I'd like to see a toggle to switch between absolute and relative display in the charts. Would you be interested in adding something like this? If so, I would look into it and add PR a couple weeks down the road.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: