Skip to content

support gharchive data source #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
lispking opened this issue Apr 23, 2025 · 6 comments
Closed

support gharchive data source #7

lispking opened this issue Apr 23, 2025 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lispking
Copy link
Owner

lispking commented Apr 23, 2025

Reference: https://www.gharchive.org/

@lispking lispking changed the title support gharchive source support gharchive data source Apr 23, 2025
@sankred9527
Copy link
Contributor

let me try this ?

@lispking
Copy link
Owner Author

let me try this ?

np. thank u for your support.

@sankred9527
Copy link
Contributor

sankred9527 commented Apr 25, 2025

https://github.com/sankred9527/fluxus-gharchive-source

because there maybe hundreds of different data source , so I create a new git repo , no pull request .

can I create a repo in your org ?

@lispking
Copy link
Owner Author

lispking commented Apr 25, 2025

It is recommended to directly submit a pull request (PR) to the develop branch for easier unified management.

You can turn it into a feature switch so that developers can easily decide which one to use.

@lispking
Copy link
Owner Author

https://github.com/sankred9527/fluxus-gharchive-source

because there maybe hundreds of different data source , so I create a new git repo , no pull request .

can I create a repo in your org ?

It is recommended to implement it using the HTTP method.
This way, it's convenient for users to directly pull the package.

@sankred9527
Copy link
Contributor

sankred9527 commented Apr 25, 2025

#38

support both http get and local file now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants