You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I just change your code with ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(224, 224)), which end with a lower accuaracy of 90.15%. do you have other changes to get the 9511%?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When I use ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(32, 32)) , remove the max-pooling for imagenet, and change self.conv1 for CIFAR10 , I just get a precision 89% on CIFAR10.
I just tried ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(32, 32)) , remove the max-pooling for imagenet, and change self.conv1 for CIFAR10 to nn.Conv2d(3, 64, kernel_size=3, stride=1, padding=1, bias=False), but I got gradient explosion. Did you make any other changes?
Hi, I just change your code with ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(224, 224)), which end with a lower accuaracy of 90.15%. do you have other changes to get the 9511%?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: