Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unable to get the cifar10 accuracy #7

Open
Dongshengjiang opened this issue Feb 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

unable to get the cifar10 accuracy #7

Dongshengjiang opened this issue Feb 27, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Dongshengjiang
Copy link

Hi, I just change your code with ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(224, 224)), which end with a lower accuaracy of 90.15%. do you have other changes to get the 9511%?

@leaderj1001
Copy link
Owner

When I try training, I use 32x32 resolution.
Could you plz try again :)
Thanks

@yutinyang
Copy link

yutinyang commented Mar 31, 2021

When I use ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(32, 32)) , remove the max-pooling for imagenet, and change self.conv1 for CIFAR10 , I just get a precision 89% on CIFAR10.

@baileyyeah0326
Copy link

I just tried ResNet50(num_classes=10, resolution=(32, 32)) , remove the max-pooling for imagenet, and change self.conv1 for CIFAR10 to nn.Conv2d(3, 64, kernel_size=3, stride=1, padding=1, bias=False), but I got gradient explosion. Did you make any other changes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants