-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong pair potential will be used for those pairs not specified in parameter file #76
Comments
I think if the parameters are not defined and we are using ppoton = 1 the
program should give an error.
Why would we want them to be 0 if they are not defined?
…On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Chang Liu ***@***.***> wrote:
In subroutines like PAIRPOTTAB, the part for determine which pair
potential to use is like this:
IF ((ATELE(I) .EQ. PPELE1(K) .AND. ATELE(J) .EQ. PPELE2(K)) &
.OR. (ATELE(J) .EQ. PPELE1(K) .AND. &
ATELE(I) .EQ. PPELE2(K))) THEN
PPSEL = K
RCUT = PPR(PPTABLENGTH(PPSEL), PPSEL)
RCUT2 = RCUT*RCUT
ENDIF
If the pair potential is not defined for a pair of atom, it will use the
pair potential function of last loop to compute the pair potential. Maybe
it will be better to use zero for these non-existing parameters? It seems
set RCUT2=ZERO for those pairs will make it wok.
IF ((ATELE(I) .EQ. PPELE1(K) .AND. ATELE(J) .EQ. PPELE2(K)) &
.OR. (ATELE(J) .EQ. PPELE1(K) .AND. &
ATELE(I) .EQ. PPELE2(K))) THEN
PPSEL = K
RCUT = PPR(PPTABLENGTH(PPSEL), PPSEL)
RCUT2 = RCUT*RCUT
ELSE
RCUT2 = ZERO
ENDIF
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#76>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQltX_GmKPGIyleUyQBQrRs5Uf6SQ-Cks5uF_nBgaJpZM4VOKyC>
.
--
Dr. Christian F. A . Negre
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY
T-1 Division, Mail Stop B221
Los Alamos, NM 87545
|
Give an error message will also work. It will not give an error for PPOTON=2. I'm trying to fit the repulsive potential for Fe-C in the table format. In order to do that, I will need to set Fe-C repulsive potential to be zero first. I try both setting Fe-C pair potential to zero or directly remove the Fe-C parameter from ppots.dftb file. The two ways gave very different forces and energy. That's why I open this issue... |
So you need to turn of ppot only for a selected pair of species. Could you
do that by setting the
preexponential factor to 0?
…On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Chang Liu ***@***.***> wrote:
Give an error message will also work. It will not give an error for
PPOTON=2. I'm trying to fit the repulsive potential for Fe-C in the table
format. In order to do that, I will need to set Fe-C repulsive potential to
be zero first. I try both setting Fe-C pair potential to zero or directly
remove the Fe-C parameter from ppots.dftb file. The two ways gave very
different forces and energy. That's why I open this issue...
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#76 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQltdzSGOy0HHZ-YSr8C6BbSJ7Jj81eks5uGAFJgaJpZM4VOKyC>
.
--
Dr. Christian F. A . Negre
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY
T-1 Division, Mail Stop B221
Los Alamos, NM 87545
|
Yes, I can do that. And in fact, that is just what I did. I'm using table format (PPOTON= 2), I just set the second column of the table to be zero for Fe C. It seems on my computer, for PPOTON= 1, it will not raise an error if a pair parameter is not defined either. (see attached example) |
I see. Feel free to add an error message if ppot is 1 and the parameters
are not defined. That
is something that we need.
…On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Chang Liu ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, I can do that. And in fact, that is just what I did. I'm using table
format (PPOTON= 2), I just set the second column of the table to be zero
for Fe C.
It seems on my computer, for PPOTON= 1, it will not raise an error if a
pair parameter is not defined either. (see attached example)
test_ppots.zip
<https://github.com/lanl/LATTE/files/2191028/test_ppots.zip>
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#76 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APQltXkDlP6jurEX9PruIJ-JIPIe4M29ks5uGAmUgaJpZM4VOKyC>
.
--
Dr. Christian F. A . Negre
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY
T-1 Division, Mail Stop B221
Los Alamos, NM 87545
|
In subroutines like PAIRPOTTAB, the part for determine which pair potential to use is like this:
If the pair potential is not defined for a pair of atom, it will use the pair potential function of last loop to compute the pair potential. Maybe it will be better to use zero for these non-existing parameters? It seems set RCUT2=ZERO for those pairs will make it work. (the code just put is wrong, just corrected it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: