Skip to content

[Copilot Planning] Meshspaces human onboarding, switching, and management completeness review #52

@kwalus

Description

@kwalus

Context: The Meshspaces UI spec needs to be fully implementable for real human operators, not just aesthetically coherent. This issue is planning-only.

Goal: Pressure-test the UI/UX plan from a human perspective and identify missing flows, controls, and failure states.

Focus areas:

  • first-run mesh creation wizard
  • invite import routing and review UX
  • switching cleanly between meshspaces
  • active mesh framing inside child runtimes
  • runtime management, trust, storage, backup, reset, archive, and diagnostics controls
  • mobile behavior and shared-screen privacy considerations
  • whether a non-developer operator could actually manage this safely

Expected deliverable:

  • Open a PR from a Copilot branch with a findings report in docs/meshspaces-review/human-ux-and-management.md
  • Optional spec clarifications in docs are welcome. No feature implementation.

Ground rules:

  • Do not redesign Canopy broadly.
  • Focus on missing flows, confusion points, and operator safety.
  • Distinguish what belongs in shell UI vs child runtime UI.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions