Fixed #440 - Upgrade ITF Framework Maven Version minimum to 3.8.1

Author: sparsick

itf-documentation/src/main/asciidoc/release-notes/_release-notes-0.14.0.adoc

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 :issue-453: https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/issues/453[Fixed #453]
 :issue-455: https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/issues/455[Fixed #455]
 :issue-456: https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/issues/456[Fixed #456]
+:issue-440: https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/issues/440[Fixed #440]
 
 :release_0_14_0: https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension/milestone/14
 
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@
  * {issue-420} - Upgrade assertj-bom to 3.25.0
  * {issue-451} - Upgrade assertj-bom to 3.25.1
  * {issue-453} - Upgrade memoryfilesystem to 2.8.0
- * {issue-???} - ?
+ * {issue-440} - Upgrade ITF Framework Maven Version minimum to 3.8.1
 
 *Build Improvements*
 

itf-examples/src/test/java/com/soebes/itf/examples/goals/MetaAnnotationGoalIT.java

@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ void clean_verify(MavenExecutionResult result) {
         .info()
         .containsSubsequence(
             "Scanning for projects...",
-            "-------------------< com.soebes.katas:kata-fraction >-------------------",
-            "--------------------------------[ jar ]---------------------------------",
             "--- clean:3.3.2:clean (default-clean) @ kata-fraction ---",
             "--- enforcer:3.4.1:enforce (enforce-maven) @ kata-fraction ---",
             "--- jacoco:0.8.11:prepare-agent (default) @ kata-fraction ---",

itf-failure-plugin/src/test/java/com/soebes/itf/maven/plugin/failure/FailureIT.java

@@ -30,9 +30,7 @@
 @MavenJupiterExtension
 class FailureIT {
 
-  private static final String SEPARATOR_LINE = "------------------------------------------------------------------------";
-
-  @MavenTest
+    @MavenTest
   @DisplayName("The basic configuration should result in a successful build.")
   void basic_configuration(MavenExecutionResult project) {
     assertThat(project).isSuccessful().out().warn().contains("Neither executionException nor failureException has been set.");
@@ -42,7 +40,7 @@ void basic_configuration(MavenExecutionResult project) {
   void fail_with_mojo_execution_exception(MavenExecutionResult result) {
     assertThat(result).isFailure();
 
-    assertThat(result).out().info().containsSequence(SEPARATOR_LINE, "BUILD FAILURE", SEPARATOR_LINE);
+    assertThat(result).out().info().containsSequence("BUILD FAILURE");
 
     //TODO: Is there a simpler way to do this? Can we somehow create better support for that?
     assertThat(result).out().error().filteredOn(s -> s.startsWith("Failed to execute goal ")).satisfies(s -> {
@@ -58,7 +56,7 @@ void fail_with_mojo_execution_exception(MavenExecutionResult result) {
   void fail_with_mojo_failure_exception(MavenExecutionResult result) {
     assertThat(result).isFailure();
 
-    assertThat(result).out().info().containsSequence(SEPARATOR_LINE, "BUILD FAILURE", SEPARATOR_LINE);
+    assertThat(result).out().info().containsSequence("BUILD FAILURE");
 
     //TODO: Is there a simpler way to do this? Can we somehow create better support for that?
     assertThat(result).out().error().filteredOn(s -> s.startsWith("Failed to execute goal ")).satisfies(s -> {

pom.xml

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
       <dependency>
         <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
         <artifactId>maven-model</artifactId>
-        <version>3.2.5</version>
+        <version>3.8.1</version>
       </dependency>
       <dependency>
         <groupId>org.apache.maven.resolver</groupId>