You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For this I have already added a few pull-requests that are directly related to the challenge and that have blocked us in developing the customized providers:
At least one of these is a quick-fix because I am missing the time to make everything nice and clean
The changes that are a MUST for us are marked with required change
there is also an issue on which a colleague of mine is currently working on. We could provide our own custom-implementaton for this but I think it is a good idea to support this natively in keycloak:
We will probably provide a few more pull-requests based on this. Would be great if the working group and core-team could support us to make at least the required changes available for keycloak 26.
Discussion
No response
Motivation
No response
Details
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Hi we need some changes in the Keycloak because we are currently working on a protocol extension based on the FUNKEN challenge for OpenID4VCI: https://www.sprind.org/de/challenges/eudi-wallet-prototypes/
The challenge does not completely apply to the current states of the specification
and therefore we need to customize some parts that will simply be custom-provider implementations.
For this I have already added a few pull-requests that are directly related to the challenge and that have blocked us in developing the customized providers:
At least one of these is a quick-fix because I am missing the time to make everything nice and clean
The changes that are a MUST for us are marked with
required change
there is also an issue on which a colleague of mine is currently working on. We could provide our own custom-implementaton for this but I think it is a good idea to support this natively in keycloak:
We will probably provide a few more pull-requests based on this. Would be great if the working group and core-team could support us to make at least the required changes available for keycloak 26.
Discussion
No response
Motivation
No response
Details
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: