Creating panes under a single broad pane does not work.

[travisroberts-sf]

Maybe I'm not going about this the right way, but I've been playing around with this a bit and I can't seem to make it work. Based off of the documented position scheme, I "should" be able to create a row of panes below a single larger one.

Below is the documented example of the small panes arranged vertically next to a full height pane with their corresponding positions:

.--------------------.--------------------.
| 1/1                | 2/1                |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|--------------------|                    |
| 1/2                |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|--------------------|                    |
| 1/3                |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
'--------------------'--------------------'

Following that logic I had hoped the following would work but it doesn't see to. It only creates the first pane on the second row and then stops:

.-----------------------------------------.
| 1/1                                     |
|                                         |
|                                         |
|                                         |
|                                         |
|                                         |
|-------------.-------------.-------------.
| 1/2         | 2/2         | 3/2         |
|             |             |             |
|             |             |             |
|             |             |             |
|             |             |             |
|             |             |             |
'-------------'-------------'-------------'

Do I have the positions wrong, or is this a limitation in the program?

[JohnLegrandRichards]

See #5

[JohnLegrandRichards]

Closing issue because it is a duplicate