Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In readme, the freq baseline model of this repo has the best performance (sgdet@50=25.0), (sgdet@100=28.5) ?? So strange!! #89

Open
zyong812 opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@zyong812
Copy link

Dear author,

I feel confused when seeing this results. Does it mean that those complex models using contextualization cannot even beat the simple statistical freq model?

@zyong812 zyong812 changed the title The freq of this repo is the best model (sgdet@50=25.0), (sgdet@100=28.5) ?? The freq of this repo is the best model (sgdet@50=25.0), (sgdet@100=28.5) ?? So strange!! Mar 10, 2020
@zyong812 zyong812 changed the title The freq of this repo is the best model (sgdet@50=25.0), (sgdet@100=28.5) ?? So strange!! In readme, the freq baseline model of this repo has the best performance (sgdet@50=25.0), (sgdet@100=28.5) ?? So strange!! Mar 18, 2020
@ZhuYun97
Copy link

image
You can compare this model with these models mentioned in Neural Motifs paper.

@zyong812
Copy link
Author

zyong812 commented May 6, 2020

image
You can compare this model with these models mentioned in Neural Motifs paper.

Thank you! I know what you mean. I am just curious about why the implementation of this repo cannot even beat using frequency statistics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants