Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does this work with minecraft-bedrock-server images? #15

Open
rulimanurung opened this issue Dec 8, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Does this work with minecraft-bedrock-server images? #15

rulimanurung opened this issue Dec 8, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@rulimanurung
Copy link

Hi there, as per title, I'm wondering whether this router also supports your minecraft-bedrock-server Docker images? And if not, is this something that would be possible to implement? Thanks in advance!

@itzg
Copy link
Owner

itzg commented Dec 8, 2020

Sorry, no, the Bedrock server's protocol is not currently supported. It could be added later, but for now this solution might help you:

itzg/docker-minecraft-bedrock-server#110 (comment)

@leonardlaw
Copy link

I was trying to use this to put a few bedrock servers behind a traefik reverse proxy -- would love to see support here.

@nsd0tklostermann
Copy link

Any update on this? :D Would be nice

@itzg
Copy link
Owner

itzg commented Dec 8, 2022

No update since Bedrock still speaks a totally different protocol 😀.

I am curious now if Raknet (I think that's the protocol name) gives enough handshake info to multiplex sessions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants