UG/DG links not working

[itsleeqian]

The majority of the links in the UG & DG table of contents are actually not working/non existent.

The inconsistency between some sections having links and others not, definitely leads to confusion for the reader.

Throughout the document(s) also, some keywords have links to their respective sections, and others do not.

[nus-pe-script]

Team's Response

As there are multiple bugs provided, we chose this as a duplicate of our DG hyperlinks not working.

From the image, the severity of broken links should be low or medium. We believe a medium severity entails links that bring users to wrong segments of the DG, as that would cause more inconvenience than one where the links do not work. In this case where the links do not work, users can still scroll to the respective parts of the UG as we have added proper headers, thus this issue should be of low severity.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Hyperlinks on DG not working

The hyperlinks on the DG from Product Scope onwards do not work. This diminishes the user experience greatly, as navigation of the DG becomes much more cumbersome

---

_{[original: nus-cs2113-AY2122S1/pe-interim#2142] [original labels: severity.High type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

From the image, the severity of broken links should be low or medium. We believe a medium severity entails links that bring users to wrong segments of the DG, as that would cause more inconvenience than one where the links do not work. In this case where the links do not work, users can still scroll to the respective parts of the UG as we have added proper headers, thus this issue should be of low severity.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.High]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---