Refactor the "Implementation status" page. #697
Labels
dif/hard
Having worked on the specific codebase is important
kind/enhancement
A net-new feature or an improvement to an existing feature
need/analysis
Needs further analysis before proceeding
P2
Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
status/ready
Ready to be worked
topic/docs
Documentation
As mentioned by @lidel and @Gozala in #678, the Implementation status page could do with a revamp.
First off, it's out of date. We need to go through and check if each feature is available/implemented yet in each product.
Secondly, as @gozola pointed out in a different thread, things are a bit more complicated than a simple X has Y. Sometimes X has a subset of Y, while Z contains a different subset of Y.
I don't have enough knowledge or bandwidth to tackle this solo. @Gozala would you be interested in helping out here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: