Skip to content

GSK feedback - important vs 'appendix' type information to improve readibility #51

Description

@epijim

Currently the report is very verbose, and not human friendly. Feedback received (in this meeting) to try and split it out - e.g. can we target something like 1 page that flags key issues, and push back things like the record of how each documented feature was tested to an appendix.

Tagging people that attended: @dgkf @epijim @tlblnk

An example report run on admiral with current template is attached.

validation-report.pdf

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions