Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
983 lines (796 loc) · 30.8 KB

codeql-dataflow-sql-injection.md

File metadata and controls

983 lines (796 loc) · 30.8 KB

CodeQL Tutorial for C/C++: Data Flow and SQL Injection

Setup Instructions

To run CodeQL queries on dotnet/coreclr, follow these steps:

  1. Install the Visual Studio Code IDE.

  2. Download and install the CodeQL extension for Visual Studio Code. Full setup instructions are here.

  3. Set up the starter workspace.

    • Important: Don't forget to git clone --recursive or git submodule update --init --remote, so that you obtain the standard query libraries.
  4. Open the starter workspace: File > Open Workspace > Browse to vscode-codeql-starter/vscode-codeql-starter.code-workspace.

  5. Download the sample database codeql-dataflow-sql-injection-d5b28fb.zip

  6. Unzip the database.

  7. Import the unzipped database into Visual Studio Code:

    • Click the CodeQL icon in the left sidebar.
    • Place your mouse over Databases, and click the + sign that appears on the right.
    • Choose the unzipped database directory on your filesystem.
  8. Create a new file, name it SqliInjection.ql, save it under codeql-custom-queries-cpp.

Documentation Links

If you get stuck, try searching our documentation and blog posts for help and ideas. Below are a few links to help you get started:

Codeql Recap

This is a brief review of CodeQL taken from the full introduction. For more details, see the documentation links. We will revisit all of this during the tutorial.

from, where, select

Recall that codeql is a declarative language and a basic query is defined by a select clause, which specifies what the result of the query should be. For example:

import cpp

select "hello world"

More complicated queries look like this:

from /* ... variable declarations ... */
where /* ... logical formulas ... */
select /* ... expressions ... */

The from clause specifies some variables that will be used in the query. The where clause specifies some conditions on those variables in the form of logical formulas. The select clauses specifies what the results should be, and can refer to variables defined in the from clause.

The from clause is defined as a series of variable declarations, where each declaration has a type and a name. For example:

from IfStmt ifStmt
select ifStmt

We are declaring a variable with the name ifStmt and the type IfStmt (from the CodeQL standard library for analyzing C/C++). Variables represent a set of values, initially constrained by the type of the variable. Here, the variable ifStmt represents the set of all if statements in the C/C++ program, as we can see if we run the query.

A query using all three clauses to find empty blocks:

from IfStmt ifStmt, Block block
where
  ifStmt.getThen() = block and
  block.getNumStmt() = 0
select ifStmt, "Empty if statement"

Predicates

The other feature we will use are predicates. These provide a way to encapsulate portions of logic in the program so that they can be reused. You can think of them as a mini from-where-select query clause. Like a select clause they also produce a set of "tuples" or rows in a result table.

We can introduce a new predicate in our query that identifies the set of empty blocks in the program (for example, to reuse this feature in another query):

predicate isEmptyBlock(Block block) {
  block.getNumStmt() = 0
}

from IfStmt ifStmt
where isEmptyBlock(ifStmt.getThen())
select ifStmt, "Empty if statement"

Existential quantifiers (local variables in queries)

Although the terminology may sound scary if you are not familiar with logic and logic programming, existential quantifiers are simply ways to introduce temporary variables with some associated conditions. The syntax for them is:

exists(<variable declarations> | <formula>)

They have a similar structure to the from and where clauses, where the first part allows you to declare one or more variables, and the second formula ("conditions") that can be applied to those variables.

For example, we can use this to refactor the query

from IfStmt ifStmt, Block block
where
  ifStmt.getThen() = block and
  block.getNumStmt() = 0
select ifStmt, "Empty if statement"

to use a temporary variable for the empty block:

from IfStmt ifStmt
where
  exists(Block block |
    ifStmt.getThen() = block and
    block.getNumStmt() = 0
  )
select ifStmt, "Empty if statement"

This is frequently used to convert a query into a predicate.

Classes

Classes are a way in which you can define new types within CodeQL, as well as providing an easy way to reuse and structure code.

Like all types in CodeQL, classes represent a set of values. For example, the Block type is, in fact, a class, and it represents the set of all blocks in the program. You can also think of a class as defining a set of logical conditions that specifies the set of values for that class.

For example, we can define a new CodeQL class to represent empty blocks:

class EmptyBlock extends Block {
  EmptyBlock() {
    this.getNumStmt() = 0
  }
}

and use it in a query:

from IfStmt ifStmt, EmptyBlock block
where ifStmt.getThen() = block
select ifStmt, "Empty if statement"

The Problem in Action

Running the code is a great way to see the problem and check whether the code is vulnerable.

This program can be compiled and linked, and a simple sqlite db created via

# Build
./build.sh

# Prepare db
./admin -r
./admin -c 
./admin -s

Users can be added via stdin in several ways; the second is a pretend "server" using the echo command.

# Add regular user interactively
./add-user 2>> users.log
First User

# Regular user via "external" process
echo "User Outside" | ./add-user 2>> users.log

Check the db and log:

# Check
./admin -s

tail -4 users.log 

Looks ok:

0:$ ./admin -s
87797|First User
87808|User Outside

0:$ tail -4 users.log 
[Tue Jul 21 14:15:46 2020] query: INSERT INTO users VALUES (87797, 'First User')
[Tue Jul 21 14:17:07 2020] query: INSERT INTO users VALUES (87808, 'User Outside')

But there may be bad input; this one guesses the table name and drops it:

# Add Johnny Droptable 
./add-user 2>> users.log
Johnny'); DROP TABLE users; --

And then we have this:

# And the problem:
./admin -s
0:$ ./admin -s
Error: near line 2: no such table: users

What happened? The log shows that data was treated as command:

1:$ tail -4 users.log 
[Tue Jul 21 14:15:46 2020] query: INSERT INTO users VALUES (87797, 'First User')
[Tue Jul 21 14:17:07 2020] query: INSERT INTO users VALUES (87808, 'User Outside')
[Tue Jul 21 14:18:25 2020] query: INSERT INTO users VALUES (87817, 'Johnny'); DROP TABLE users; --')

Looking ahead, we now know that there is unsafe external data (source) which reaches (flow path) a database-writing command (sink). Thus, a query written against this code should find at least one taint flow path.

Problem Statement

Many security problems can be phrased in terms of information flow:

Given a (problem-specific) set of sources and sinks, is there a path in the data flow graph from some source to some sink?

The example we look at is SQL injection: sources are user-input, sinks are SQL queries processing a string formed at runtime.

When parts of the string can be specified by the user, they allow an attacker to insert arbitrary sql statements; these could erase a table or extract internal data etc.

We will use CodeQL to analyze the source code constructing a SQL query using string concatenation and then executing that query string. The following example uses the sqlite3 library; it

  • receives user-provided data from stdin and keeps it in buf
  • uses environment data and stores it in id,
  • runs a query in sqlite3_exec

This is intentionally simple code, but it has all the elements that have to be considered in real code and illustrates the QL features.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <sqlite3.h>
#include <time.h>

void write_log(const char* fmt, ...);

void abort_on_error(int rc, sqlite3 *db);

void abort_on_exec_error(int rc, sqlite3 *db, char* zErrMsg);
    
char* get_user_info() {
#define BUFSIZE 1024
    char* buf = (char*) malloc(BUFSIZE * sizeof(char));
    int count;
    // Disable buffering to avoid need for fflush
    // after printf().
    setbuf( stdout, NULL );
    printf("*** Welcome to sql injection ***\n");
    printf("Please enter name: ");
    count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);
    if (count <= 0) abort();
    /* strip trailing whitespace */
    while (count && isspace(buf[count-1])) {
        buf[count-1] = 0; --count;
    }
    return buf;
}

int get_new_id() {
    int id = getpid();
    return id;
}

void write_info(int id, char* info) {
    sqlite3 *db;
    int rc;
    int bufsize = 1024;
    char *zErrMsg = 0;
    char query[bufsize];
    
    /* open db */
    rc = sqlite3_open("users.sqlite", &db);
    abort_on_error(rc, db);

    /* Format query */
    snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);
    write_log("query: %s\n", query);

    /* Write info */
    rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);
    abort_on_exec_error(rc, db, zErrMsg);

    sqlite3_close(db);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    char* info;
    int id;
    info = get_user_info();
    id = get_new_id();
    write_info(id, info);
    /*
     * show_info(id);
     */
}

In terms of sources, sinks, and information flow, the concrete problem for codeql is:

  1. specifying buf as source,
  2. specifying the query argument to sqlite3_exec() as sink,
  3. specifying some code-specific data flow steps for the codeql library,
  4. using the codeql taint flow library find taint flow paths (if there are any) between the source and the sink.

In the following, we go into more concrete detail and develop codedql scripts to solve this problem.

Data flow overview and illustration

In the previous sections we identified the sources of problematic strings (accesses of info etc.), and the sink that their data may flow to (the argument to sqlite3_exec).

We need to see if there is data flow between the source(s) and this sink.

The solution here is to use the data flow library. Data flow is, as the name suggests, about tracking the flow of data through the program. It helps answers questions like: does this expression ever hold a value that originates from a particular other place in the program?

We can visualize the data flow problem as one of finding paths through a directed graph, where the nodes of the graph are elements in program, and the edges represent the flow of data between those elements. If a path exists, then the data flows between those two nodes.

This graph represents the flow of data from the tainted parameter. The nodes of graph represent program elements that have a value, such as function parameters and expressions. The edges of this graph represent flow through these nodes.

There are two variants of data flow available in CodeQL:

  • Local (“intra-procedural”) data flow models flow within one function; feasible to compute for all functions in a CodeQL database.
  • Global (“inter-procedural”) data flow models flow across function calls; not feasible to compute for all functions in a CodeQL database.

While local data flow is feasible to compute for all functions in a CodeQL database, global data flow is not. This is because the number of paths becomes exponentially larger for global data flow.

The global data flow (and taint tracking) library avoids this problem by requiring that the query author specifies which sources and sinks are applicable. This allows the implementation to compute paths only between the restricted set of nodes, rather than for the full graph.

To illustrate the dataflow for this problem, we have a collection of slides for this workshop.

Tutorial: Sources, Sinks and Flow Steps

The tutorial is split into several steps and introduces concepts as they are needed. Experimentation with the presented queries is encouraged, and the autocomplete suggestions (Ctrl + Space) and the jump-to-definition command (F12 in VS Code) are good ways explore the libraries.

The Data Sink

Now let's find the function sqlite3_exec. In CodeQL, this uses Function and a getName() attribute.

from Function f
where f.getName() = "sqlite3_exec" 
select f

This should find one result,

SQLITE_API int sqlite3_exec(
  sqlite3*,                                  /* An open database */
  const char *sql,                           /* SQL to be evaluated */
  int (*callback)(void*,int,char**,char**),  /* Callback function */
  void *,                                    /* 1st argument to callback */
  char **errmsg                              /* Error msg written here */
);

in the header sqlite3.h.

Next, let's find the calls to sqlite3_exec using the FunctionCall type

from FunctionCall exec
where exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" 
select exec

This finds our call in add-user.c,

rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);

We are interested in the query argument, which we can get using .getArgument:

from FunctionCall exec, Expr query
where
    exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
    query = exec.getArgument(1)
select exec, query

The Data Source

The external data enters through the call

count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);

We thus want the buf argument to the call of the read function. Together, this is

from FunctionCall read, Expr buf
where
    read.getTarget().getName() = "read" and
    buf = read.getArgument(1)
select read, buf

The Extra Flow Step

The codeql data flow library traverses visible source code fairly well, but flow through opaque functions requires additional support (more on this later). Functions for which only a headers is available are opaque, and we have one of these here: the call to snprintf. Once we locate this call, there are two nodes to identify: the inflow and outflow.

Let's start with snprintf. If we try

from FunctionCall printf
where printf.getTarget().getName() = "snprintf"
select printf

we get zero results. This is puzzling; if we visit the add-user.c source and follow the definition of snprintf, it turns out to be a macro on MacOS:

#undef snprintf
#define snprintf(str, len, ...) \
  __builtin___snprintf_chk (str, len, 0, __darwin_obsz(str), __VA_ARGS__)
#endif

Fortunately, the underlying function __builtin___snprintf_chk has snprintf in the name. So instead of working with C macros from codeql, we generalize our query using a name pattern with .matches:

from FunctionCall printf
where printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%")
select printf

This identifies our call

snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);

and we need the inflow and outflow nodes next. query is the outflow, info is the inflow.

In the snprintf macro call, those have indices 0 and 4. In the underlying function __builtin___snprintf_chk, the indices are 0 and 6. Using the latter:

from FunctionCall printf, Expr out, Expr into
where
    printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%") and
    printf.getArgument(0) = out and
    printf.getArgument(6) = into
select printf, out, into

This correctly identifies the call and the extra flow arguments.

Practice exercise: If you are using linux or windows, generalize this query for the snprintf arguments found there. One way to do this is using or:

printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%") and
(
  // mac version
or
 // linux version
or
 // windows version
)

The CodeQL Taint Flow Configuration

The previous queries identify our source, sink and one additional flow step. To use global data flow and taint tracking we need some additional codeql setup:

  • a taint flow configuration
  • the path problem header and imports
  • a query formatted for path problems.

These are done next.

Taint Flow Configuration

The way we configure global taint flow is by creating a custom extension of the TaintTracking::Configuration class, and speciyfing isSource, isSink, and isAdditionalTaintStep predicates.

The sources and sinks were explained earlier. Data flow and taint tracking configuration classes support a number of additional features that help configure the process of building and exploring the data flow path.

One such feature is adding additional taint steps. This is useful if you use libraries which are not modelled by the default taint tracking. You can implement this by overriding isAdditionalTaintStep predicate. This has two parameters, the from and the to node, and it essentially allows you to add extra edges into the taint tracking or data flow graph.

A starting configuration can look like the following, with details to be filled in.

class SqliFlowConfig extends TaintTracking::Configuration {
    SqliFlowConfig() { this = "SqliFlow" }

    override predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
        // count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);
    }

    override predicate isSanitizer(DataFlow::Node sanitizer) { none() }

    override predicate isAdditionalTaintStep(DataFlow::Node into, DataFlow::Node out) {
        // Extra taint step for 
        //     snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);
    }

    override predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
        // rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);
    }
}

TaintTracking::Configuration is a configuration class. In this case, there will be a single instance of the class, identified by a unique string specified in the characteristic predicate. We then override the isSource predicates to represent the set of possible sources in the program, and isSink to represent the possible set of sinks in the program.

Path Problem Setup

Queries will only list sources and sinks by default. To inspect these results and work with them, we also need the data paths from source to sink. For this, the query needs to have the form of a path problem query.

This requires a modifications to the query header and an extra import:

  • The @kind comment has to be path-problem. This tells the CodeQL toolchain to interpret the results of this query as path results.
  • A new import DataFlow::PathGraph, which will report the path data alongside the query results.

Together, this looks like

/**
 * @name SQLI Vulnerability
 * @description Using untrusted strings in a sql query allows sql injection attacks.
 * @kind path-problem
 * @id cpp/SQLIVulnerable
 * @problem.severity warning
 */

import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.TaintTracking
import DataFlow::PathGraph

Path Problem Query Format

To use this new configuration and PathGraph support, we call the hasFlowPath(source, sink) predicate, which will compute a reachability table between the defined sources and sinks. Behind the scenes, you can think of this as performing a graph search algorithm from sources to sinks. The query will look like this:

from SqliFlowConfig conf, DataFlow::PathNode source, DataFlow::PathNode sink
where conf.hasFlowPath(source, sink)
select sink, source, sink, "Possible SQL injection"

Tutorial: Taint Flow Details

With the dataflow configuration in place, we just need to provide the details for source(s), sink(s), and taint step(s).

Some more steps are required to convert our previous queries for use in data flow. These are covered here.

The isSink Predicate

Note that our previous queries used Expr nodes, but the taint query requires DataFlow::Node nodes.

We have identified arguments to the call of the sqlite3_exec function via the query

from FunctionCall exec, Expr query
where
    exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
    query = exec.getArgument(1)
select exec, query

First, we need to incorporate the DataFlow::Node. The key to this is node.asExpr(), which yields the node's expression. Adding this we get

import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.TaintTracking

from FunctionCall exec, Expr query, DataFlow::Node sink
where
    exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
    query = exec.getArgument(1) and
    sink.asExpr() = query
select exec, query, sink

Notice that query is now redundant, so this simplifies to

from FunctionCall exec, DataFlow::Node sink
where
    exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
    sink.asExpr() = exec.getArgument(1) 
select exec, sink

Second, we need this as a predicate of a single argument, predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink). For this we introduce the exists() quantifier to move the FunctionCall exec into the body of the query and remove it from the result:

from DataFlow::Node sink
where
    exists(FunctionCall exec |
        exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
        sink.asExpr() = exec.getArgument(1)
    )
select sink

To turn this into a predicate, from contents become arguments, the where becomes the body, and the select is dropped:

predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
    // rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);
    exists(FunctionCall exec |
        exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
        sink.asExpr() = exec.getArgument(1)
    )
}

The isSource Predicate

Recall that the external data enters through the buf argument to the call

count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);

and we got this via the query

from FunctionCall read, Expr buf
where
    read.getTarget().getName() = "read" and
    buf = read.getArgument(1)
select read, buf

As for the isSink predicate in the previous section, we need to convert this to a predicate of a single argument, predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source). Following the same steps, we introduce a DataFlow::Node and an exists():

import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.TaintTracking

from DataFlow::Node source
where
    exists(FunctionCall read |
        read.getTarget().getName() = "read" and
        read.getArgument(1) = source.asExpr()
    )
select source

There is one more adjustment needed for this to work. The buf argument is both read by and written to by the snprintf function call. Because we are specifying it as a source, the value of interest is the value after the call. We get this value by casting to the post-update node. Instead of source.asExpr(), we use source.(DataFlow::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr()

Last, we incorporate this into a predicate:

predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
    // count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);
    exists(FunctionCall read |
        read.getTarget().getName() = "read" and
        read.getArgument(1) = source.(DataFlow::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr()
    )
}

If you quick-eval this predicate, you will see that source is now ref arg buf instead of buf.

The isAdditionalTaintStep Predicate

Our previous query identifies the call to snprintf and the extra flow arguments:

from FunctionCall printf, Expr out, Expr into
where
    printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%") and
    printf.getArgument(0) = out and
    printf.getArgument(6) = into
select printf, out, into

As for the isSource and isSink predicates, we need to

  • change from Expr to a DataFlow::Node
  • change the outflow (out) type to a PostUpdateNode
  • convert this to a predicate

Put together:

import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.TaintTracking

predicate isAdditionalTaintStep(DataFlow::Node into, DataFlow::Node out) {
    // Extra taint step for
    //     snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);
    exists(FunctionCall printf |
        printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%") and
        printf.getArgument(0) = out.(DataFlow::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr() and
        printf.getArgument(6) = into.asExpr()
    )
}

Appendix

This appendix has the complete C source and codeql query.

The complete Query: SqlInjection.ql

The full query is

/**
 * @name SQLI Vulnerability
 * @description Using untrusted strings in a sql query allows sql injection attacks.
 * @kind path-problem
 * @id cpp/SQLIVulnerable
 * @problem.severity warning
 */

import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.TaintTracking
import DataFlow::PathGraph

class SqliFlowConfig extends TaintTracking::Configuration {
    SqliFlowConfig() { this = "SqliFlow" }

    override predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source) {
        // count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);
        exists(FunctionCall read |
            read.getTarget().getName() = "read" and
            read.getArgument(1) = source.(DataFlow::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr()
        )
    }

    override predicate isSanitizer(DataFlow::Node sanitizer) { none() }

    override predicate isAdditionalTaintStep(DataFlow::Node into, DataFlow::Node out) {
        // Extra taint step
        //     snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);
        // But snprintf is a macro on mac os.  The actual function's name is
        //     #undef snprintf
        //     #define snprintf(str, len, ...) \
        //       __builtin___snprintf_chk (str, len, 0, __darwin_obsz(str), __VA_ARGS__)
        //     #endif
        exists(FunctionCall printf |
            printf.getTarget().getName().matches("%snprintf%") and
            printf.getArgument(0) = out.(DataFlow::PostUpdateNode).getPreUpdateNode().asExpr() and
            // very specific: shifted index for macro.
            printf.getArgument(6) = into.asExpr()
        )
    }

    override predicate isSink(DataFlow::Node sink) {
        // rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);
        exists(FunctionCall exec |
            exec.getTarget().getName() = "sqlite3_exec" and
            exec.getArgument(1) = sink.asExpr()
        )
    }
}

from SqliFlowConfig conf, DataFlow::PathNode source, DataFlow::PathNode sink
where conf.hasFlowPath(source, sink)
select sink, source, sink, "Possible SQL injection"

The Database Writer: add-user.c

The complete source for the sqlite database writer

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <sqlite3.h>
#include <time.h>

void write_log(const char* fmt, ...) {
    time_t t;
    char tstr[26];
    va_list args;

    va_start(args, fmt);
    t = time(NULL);
    ctime_r(&t, tstr);
    tstr[24] = 0; /* no \n */
    fprintf(stderr, "[%s] ", tstr);
    vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
    va_end(args);
    fflush(stderr);
}

void abort_on_error(int rc, sqlite3 *db) {
    if( rc ) {
        fprintf(stderr, "Can't open database: %s\n", sqlite3_errmsg(db));
        sqlite3_close(db);
        fflush(stderr);
        abort();
    }
}

void abort_on_exec_error(int rc, sqlite3 *db, char* zErrMsg) {
    if( rc!=SQLITE_OK ){
        fprintf(stderr, "SQL error: %s\n", zErrMsg);
        sqlite3_free(zErrMsg);
        sqlite3_close(db);
        fflush(stderr);
        abort();
    }
}
    
char* get_user_info() {
#define BUFSIZE 1024
    char* buf = (char*) malloc(BUFSIZE * sizeof(char));
    int count;
    // Disable buffering to avoid need for fflush
    // after printf().
    setbuf( stdout, NULL );
    printf("*** Welcome to sql injection ***\n");
    printf("Please enter name: ");
    count = read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, BUFSIZE);
    if (count <= 0) abort();
    /* strip trailing whitespace */
    while (count && isspace(buf[count-1])) {
        buf[count-1] = 0; --count;
    }
    return buf;
}

int get_new_id() {
    int id = getpid();
    return id;
}

void write_info(int id, char* info) {
    sqlite3 *db;
    int rc;
    int bufsize = 1024;
    char *zErrMsg = 0;
    char query[bufsize];
    
    /* open db */
    rc = sqlite3_open("users.sqlite", &db);
    abort_on_error(rc, db);

    /* Format query */
    snprintf(query, bufsize, "INSERT INTO users VALUES (%d, '%s')", id, info);
    write_log("query: %s\n", query);

    /* Write info */
    rc = sqlite3_exec(db, query, NULL, 0, &zErrMsg);
    abort_on_exec_error(rc, db, zErrMsg);

    sqlite3_close(db);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    char* info;
    int id;
    info = get_user_info();
    id = get_new_id();
    write_info(id, info);
    /*
     * show_info(id);
     */
}