title |
url |
Scaling Bitcoin Tokyo 2018, Script Roundtable: OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK |
/en/newsletters/2018/10/09/#discussion-the-evolution-of-bitcoin-script |
|
title |
url |
New proposed opcode: OP_CHECKOUTPUTSHASHVERIFY |
/en/newsletters/2019/05/29/#proposed-new-opcode-for-transaction-output-commitments |
|
title |
url |
CoreDev.tech discussion: potential script changes |
/en/newsletters/2019/06/12/#potential-script-changes |
|
title |
url |
Bitcoin vaults without covenants |
/en/newsletters/2019/08/14#bitcoin-vaults-without-covenants |
|
title |
url |
OP_CHECKOUTPUTSHASHVERIFY renamed OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and updated |
/en/newsletters/2019/12/04/#op-checktemplateverify-ctv |
|
title |
url |
Suggested changes to OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY proposal |
/en/newsletters/2019/12/18/#proposed-changes-to-bip-ctv |
|
title |
url |
2019 year-in-review: OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY |
/en/newsletters/2019/12/28/#ctv |
|
title |
url |
OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY workshop report |
/en/newsletters/2020/02/12/#op-checktemplateverify-ctv-workshop |
|
title |
url |
Vault prototype using pre-signed transactions |
/en/newsletters/2020/04/22/#vaults-prototype |
|
title |
url |
Demo implementation of a multisig vaults covenant prototype |
/en/newsletters/2020/04/29/#multiparty-vault-architecture |
|
title |
url |
Discussion about how Simplicity could be used for covenants |
/en/newsletters/2020/08/05/#bip-taproot |
|
title |
url |
Replicating the `OP_CSFS` covenant-enabling opcode with `OP_CAT` and schnorr signatures |
/en/newsletters/2021/02/03/#replicating-op-checksigfromstack-with-bip340-and-op-cat |
|
title |
url |
OP_TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY opcode proposed with a taproot-native covenant design |
/en/newsletters/2021/09/15/#covenant-opcode-proposal |
|
title |
url |
Proposal for composable `OP_TX` opcode useful for constructing covenants |
/en/newsletters/2022/02/16/#simplified-alternative-to-op-txhash |
|
title |
url |
Proposed `OP_EVICT` opcode to make covenants more efficient |
/en/newsletters/2022/03/02/#proposed-opcode-to-simplify-shared-utxo-ownership |
|
title |
url |
Discussion about the risks of allowing recursive covenants |
/en/newsletters/2022/03/09/#limiting-script-language-expressiveness |
|
title |
url |
When would enabling `OP_CAT` allow recursive covenants? |
/en/newsletters/2022/05/18/#when-would-enabling-op-cat-allow-recursive-covenants |
|
title |
url |
Updated `OP_TX` opcode useful for constructing covenants |
/en/newsletters/2022/05/18/#updated-op-tx-proposal |
|
title |
url |
Discussion about Miner Extractable Value (MEV) risk from recursive covenants |
/en/newsletters/2022/05/25/#miner-extractable-value-discussion |
|
title |
url |
Proposal to use covenants and merkle trees to enable generalized smart contracts |
/en/newsletters/2022/11/16/#general-smart-contracts-in-bitcoin-via-covenants |
|
title |
url |
Proposal for `OP_VAULT` and `OP_UNVAULT` opcodes to enable convenant-based valuts |
/en/newsletters/2023/01/18/#proposal-for-new-vault-specific-opcodes |
|
title |
url |
Proposal for alternative design for `OP_VAULT` inspired by `OP_TLUV` |
/en/newsletters/2023/03/08/#alternative-design-for-op-vault |
|