You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The signal processing algorithms can be really tricky to get right; I think the best / only way to make sure they work correctly would be to use some synthetic data in and compare with the output; for example generate a synthetic signal that corresponds to a sensor that:
goes up and down following a given sinusoidal (possibly with random amplitude and frequency varying slowly in time)
tilts in X and Y directions following a given sinusoidal (possibly with random amplitude and frequency varying slowly in time)
has a given N(0, sigma_channel) known noise on each channel independently
this can be sampled at any frequency, filtered by the Kalman filter, and compared to the true value.
Doing so would be the "ultimate" test that all is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The signal processing algorithms can be really tricky to get right; I think the best / only way to make sure they work correctly would be to use some synthetic data in and compare with the output; for example generate a synthetic signal that corresponds to a sensor that:
this can be sampled at any frequency, filtered by the Kalman filter, and compared to the true value.
Doing so would be the "ultimate" test that all is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: