Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uwsgi support #210

Closed
dometto opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

uwsgi support #210

dometto opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@dometto
Copy link
Contributor

dometto commented Apr 8, 2024

The 'Best practices' section in the Readme recommends using uwsgi, but it is currently not even installed as part of the Galaxy python requirements. So support for uwsgi in this role is not working, barring manual hacks. Perhaps references to uwsgi should be removed from the documentation, or support for installing it automatically should be added?

(In addition, it seems to me that the 'Best practices' section could use some updating -- the strategy outlined there does not work without also explicitly enabling support for systemd with mule. Is this still really the best practice?)

@hexylena
Copy link
Member

hexylena commented Apr 9, 2024

uWSGI is no longer possible to use, references to it should be removed completely.

no it is not current best practice, you're right it needs an update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants