-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Table api is very obscure #48
Comments
Because the functionality is taken from spiritual role model ClosedXML which names it the same.
Again, because there's no equivalent in ClosedXML. In addition, there is no equivalent in MS Excel. It does not differentiate between header and body. There is only the full table and, as a subset, the header row.
A TableField. Again a class derived from ClosedXML's pendant which is defined as a header cell and its data cells. "TableField" is a strange name, "TableColumn" would make more sense to me but blame the ClosedXML guys for this. 😂 |
Even if that is true, the api contains the
This is a bad reason in my opinion. Why not improve f# wrapper api over ClosedXML/OpenXML api. |
office-js also seems superior to OpenXML to me.
You know how it is, everything must be done quickly and therefore you end up that way. 😅 |
Then please take this issue not as [Discussion] but as [Feature Request]. Be it for a more clear api, ore api functions or documentation. |
Without any documentation the table api seems impossible to navigate, as it does not use any common vocabularies from spreadsheet manipulation.
What is a field?
Why is this not
AddCell
(same forworksheet.Table
)? Why is there no "GetCell", even if i need to pass an additional cellcollection.Why can i access
HeaderRow
, but not body?In addition #45
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: