You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are many ways we could display a review because we have two (three) different dates associated with reviews: observed_on (manually entered), created_at (creation date), updated_at (creation or last edit date) and either an associated author and/or user_id or not. If the latter two are defined, then in the near future we will want author name to link to a user_id profile page.
I think we could redesign with an eye towards visual simplicity and ease of translation.
User and date
The first line could simply be:
{user} · {date}
where {user} is:
if author and not user_id: <UserIcon> {author}
if author and user_id (once profile pages exist): <a href="{user_id}"><UserIcon> {author}</a>
else: omitted or <AnonymousIcon>
and {date} is:
if observed_on: observed {observed_on}
if updated_at > created_at: {updated_at}
else {created_at}
I think it is important to highlight observed_on, but not necessary to distinguish between created_at and updated_at. Thoughts?
Own reviews
For reviews by the logged in user, I think "You reviewed this location on {date}" could be replaced by styling of the {user} element (e.g. user name in bold?). The current grey background (but a lighter grey?) for these reviews might be nice applied to all reviews, to help separate them from the background and each other.
"Update or delete this review." could be replaced with a small edit icon and delete icon (or small text links "edit" and "delete").
Tags
Fruiting status, quality rating, and yield rating could be placed on one line as done on the current website.
Fruiting status {fruiting} · Quality {quality} · Yield {yield}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Spurred by #487.
There are many ways we could display a review because we have two (three) different dates associated with reviews:
observed_on
(manually entered),created_at
(creation date),updated_at
(creation or last edit date) and either an associatedauthor
and/oruser_id
or not. If the latter two are defined, then in the near future we will wantauthor
name to link to auser_id
profile page.I think we could redesign with an eye towards visual simplicity and ease of translation.
User and date
The first line could simply be:
{user} · {date}
where
{user}
is:author
and notuser_id
:<UserIcon> {author}
author
anduser_id
(once profile pages exist):<a href="{user_id}"><UserIcon> {author}</a>
<AnonymousIcon>
and
{date}
is:observed_on
:observed {observed_on}
updated_at
>created_at
:{updated_at}
{created_at}
I think it is important to highlight
observed_on
, but not necessary to distinguish betweencreated_at
andupdated_at
. Thoughts?Own reviews
For reviews by the logged in user, I think "You reviewed this location on {date}" could be replaced by styling of the
{user}
element (e.g. user name in bold?). The current grey background (but a lighter grey?) for these reviews might be nice applied to all reviews, to help separate them from the background and each other."Update or delete this review." could be replaced with a small edit icon and delete icon (or small text links "edit" and "delete").
Tags
Fruiting status, quality rating, and yield rating could be placed on one line as done on the current website.
Fruiting status {fruiting} · Quality {quality} · Yield {yield}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: