You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a great work. It seems that in the second version of the paper, the authors additionally conducted alignment on the industry-level instruction-tuned models (e.g., Llama-3-8B-Instruct); while in the first version, the authors primarily conducted in-lab instruction tuning on the base models (e.g., Llama-3-8B). Given that the model checkpoints released in this code repository are mainly connected to the base models, could the authors further release the weights of the hardened industry-level instruction-tuned models? It would be benificial to the research community. Thanks a lot!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi authors,
This is a great work. It seems that in the second version of the paper, the authors additionally conducted alignment on the industry-level instruction-tuned models (e.g.,
Llama-3-8B-Instruct
); while in the first version, the authors primarily conducted in-lab instruction tuning on the base models (e.g.,Llama-3-8B
). Given that the model checkpoints released in this code repository are mainly connected to the base models, could the authors further release the weights of the hardened industry-level instruction-tuned models? It would be benificial to the research community. Thanks a lot!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: