Repository navigation
Commit 2c3fbd6
fix: escalate supervisor-monitor failures instead of hanging (#36)
Closes #28.
The monitor in `flatMapActorSupervised` is the top of its supervision tree —
`Actor.spawn`, not `spawnLinked`, so nothing watches it in turn — and its loop
body was bare. A throw from the user's `decide` callback, from `aobv.OnErrorAsync`
on the Escalate path, or from the `unbox`/`Post` forward killed the loop outright.
The stream then hung rather than failed: upstream kept calling `OnNextAsync`, the
posts landed in a mailbox nobody read, and the observer saw neither OnCompleted
nor OnError. On .NET the exception surfaced only on MailboxProcessor's unobserved
Error event; on BEAM not at all.
Guard the body, report the failure downstream, and stop looping — after an
OnError the Rx grammar is closed, so there is nothing left to forward. The
escalation path itself swallows secondary failures, since an exception thrown
while reporting would reproduce the exact bug being fixed.
The guard is a nested `actor { }` rather than `async { }` on purpose: it keeps
`child <- ...` inside the actor process. Confirmed in the generated Erlang — the
loop uses the actor builder's try_with and `child` stays process-dictionary
backed via erlang:get/put.
Test asserts the decider's own exception reaches downstream. Verified red-green:
without the fix it fails on Quill's 5003ms timeout — the silent hang itself —
and passes in 45ms with it.
Adds `isOnError` to Tests.Utils.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent ad64d16 commit 2c3fbd6
3 files changed
Lines changed: 90 additions & 19 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
41 | 41 | | |
42 | 42 | | |
43 | 43 | | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
44 | 55 | | |
45 | 56 | | |
46 | 57 | | |
| |||
61 | 72 | | |
62 | 73 | | |
63 | 74 | | |
64 | | - | |
65 | | - | |
66 | | - | |
67 | | - | |
68 | | - | |
69 | | - | |
70 | | - | |
71 | | - | |
72 | | - | |
73 | | - | |
74 | | - | |
75 | | - | |
76 | | - | |
77 | | - | |
78 | | - | |
79 | | - | |
80 | | - | |
81 | | - | |
82 | | - | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
| 106 | + | |
| 107 | + | |
| 108 | + | |
| 109 | + | |
| 110 | + | |
83 | 111 | | |
84 | 112 | | |
85 | 113 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
208 | 208 | | |
209 | 209 | | |
210 | 210 | | |
| 211 | + | |
| 212 | + | |
| 213 | + | |
| 214 | + | |
| 215 | + | |
| 216 | + | |
| 217 | + | |
| 218 | + | |
| 219 | + | |
| 220 | + | |
| 221 | + | |
| 222 | + | |
| 223 | + | |
| 224 | + | |
| 225 | + | |
| 226 | + | |
| 227 | + | |
| 228 | + | |
| 229 | + | |
| 230 | + | |
| 231 | + | |
| 232 | + | |
| 233 | + | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| 237 | + | |
| 238 | + | |
| 239 | + | |
| 240 | + | |
| 241 | + | |
| 242 | + | |
| 243 | + | |
| 244 | + | |
| 245 | + | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
211 | 249 | | |
212 | 250 | | |
213 | 251 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
30 | 30 | | |
31 | 31 | | |
32 | 32 | | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
33 | 38 | | |
34 | 39 | | |
35 | 40 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments