We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With scipy version 1.15.0 the following test fails: https://github.com/equinor/ert/actions/runs/12628338741/job/35184324189
Seems to be a difference in output from the fcluster method https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.cluster.hierarchy.fcluster.html
fcluster
Running the following script with scipy 1.14.1 produces: [2, 1, 1], whereas with scipy 1.15.0 you get [3,1,2] .
import numpy as np from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import fcluster, linkage C = np.array([[1.0, 0.2, -0.2], [0.2, 1.0, 0.3], [-0.2, 0.3, 1.0]]) Z = linkage(C, "average", "euclidean") print(fcluster(Z, 0, criterion="maxclust", depth=2))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Relates to #9672
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can we do a test how stable the clusterings are when using new scipy compared to the old one?
No branches or pull requests
With scipy version 1.15.0 the following test fails: https://github.com/equinor/ert/actions/runs/12628338741/job/35184324189
Seems to be a difference in output from the
fcluster
method https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.cluster.hierarchy.fcluster.htmlRunning the following script with scipy 1.14.1 produces: [2, 1, 1], whereas with scipy 1.15.0 you get [3,1,2] .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: