@@ -954,6 +954,7 @@ service:
954
954
configChan <- cfgChange
955
955
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
956
956
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "empty policy should be acknowledged" )
957
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
957
958
assert .True (t , updated , "empty policy should cause runtime manager update" )
958
959
assert .Empty (t , components , "empty policy should produce empty component model" )
959
960
assert .True (t , otelUpdated , "empty policy should cause otel manager update" )
@@ -1070,6 +1071,7 @@ service:
1070
1071
configChan <- cfgChange
1071
1072
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
1072
1073
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1074
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
1073
1075
1074
1076
// Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
1075
1077
// An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
@@ -1134,6 +1136,7 @@ service:
1134
1136
configChan <- cfgChange
1135
1137
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
1136
1138
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1139
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
1137
1140
1138
1141
// Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
1139
1142
// An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
0 commit comments