@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ service:
941
941
configChan <- cfgChange
942
942
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
943
943
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "empty policy should be acknowledged" )
944
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
944
945
assert .True (t , updated , "empty policy should cause runtime manager update" )
945
946
assert .Empty (t , components , "empty policy should produce empty component model" )
946
947
assert .True (t , otelUpdated , "empty policy should cause otel manager update" )
@@ -1057,6 +1058,7 @@ service:
1057
1058
configChan <- cfgChange
1058
1059
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
1059
1060
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1061
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
1060
1062
1061
1063
// Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
1062
1064
// An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
@@ -1121,6 +1123,7 @@ service:
1121
1123
configChan <- cfgChange
1122
1124
coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
1123
1125
assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1126
+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
1124
1127
1125
1128
// Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
1126
1129
// An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
0 commit comments