You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On smart-games, there is a mode called Set-Classic, which I think is a better way for people to measure their best times as compared to normal; the number of sets in a game varies whereas this will always have the same number of sets in each format.
In Set-Classic on smart-games, people may choose Set-10, Set-20, or Set-30, where the board never expands beyond 12 cards (which could preferably be implemented here as well if possible). The goal is to take n sets in the Set-n game mode as fast as possible.
Would prefer (by decreasing order of preference) set-30, set-20, set-10 (maybe...set-40, set-50? set-100? :P)
A probably much less popular extension: this concept could be extended to Ultraset-n too, which would be much easier to program as the 12 card board is enough to always guarantee an ultraset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On smart-games, there is a mode called Set-Classic, which I think is a better way for people to measure their best times as compared to normal; the number of sets in a game varies whereas this will always have the same number of sets in each format.
In Set-Classic on smart-games, people may choose Set-10, Set-20, or Set-30, where the board never expands beyond 12 cards (which could preferably be implemented here as well if possible). The goal is to take n sets in the Set-n game mode as fast as possible.
Would prefer (by decreasing order of preference) set-30, set-20, set-10 (maybe...set-40, set-50? set-100? :P)
A probably much less popular extension: this concept could be extended to Ultraset-n too, which would be much easier to program as the 12 card board is enough to always guarantee an ultraset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: