Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discovery and cataloging of existing edxapp pipeline #920

Open
robrap opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Discovery and cataloging of existing edxapp pipeline #920

robrap opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@robrap
Copy link
Contributor

robrap commented Jan 31, 2025

  • Document the various edxapp pipelines, stages and jobs in GoCD.
  • Determine which would need to remain as-is, or partially, in GoCD.
    • For example, if build_edxapp_amis:prerelease_materials handles the sync with edx-platform-private, that will need to live on.
  • Is investigation into the configuration repo or tubular code needed for this discovery?
  • We need a rollout plan for transitioning the pipeline.
    • Will we be slowly transforming the existing pipeline to introduce ArgoCD, or will we be introducing a brand new pipeline?
    • How do we deal with migrating processes that should only happen once (e.g. migrations, edx-platform-private sync, etc.)?
    • If we have a containerized stage environment, would we want e2e tests to ever run against this temporary environment?
    • Other questions regarding transitioning the pipeline?
  • Can we document requirements to maintain parity with our current pipeline?
    • For example, we want to maintain the ability to auto-deploy to Production.

UPDATE: It seems like SRE is planning on taking on this work, and creating a new GoCD pipeline. I think it will still be useful to help with the inventory, requirements definition, and ensuring that all of the proper SRE ticketing happens.

  • Possibly as part of this ticket, or a separate ticket, we should catalog all the dependencies (e.g. database, memcached, elasticsearch, braze, etc.). This would probably come from review of the settings. This wil also affect the ultimate test plan.
  • May want to create another ticket with a checklist of items we are expecting SRE to implement, so that we can be clear on the list and validating that the work is completed. It might point to SRE tickets as-needed as well.
@robrap robrap added this to Arch-BOM Jan 31, 2025
@robrap robrap converted this from a draft issue Jan 31, 2025
@jristau1984 jristau1984 moved this from Backlog to Ready For Development in Arch-BOM Feb 5, 2025
@robrap robrap moved this from Ready For Development to In Review in Arch-BOM Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant