Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UUF] Inaccurate info #43975

Open
gewarren opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[UUF] Inaccurate info #43975

gewarren opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
dotnet-fundamentals/svc needs-more-info Needs more info from OP. Auto-closed after 2 weeks if no response. [org][resolution] okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback".

Comments

@gewarren
Copy link
Contributor

gewarren commented Dec 14, 2024

Type of issue

Typo

Description

This article seems inaccurate since the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnect.TokenValidatedContext.SecurityToken continues to expose a JwtSecurityToken rather than JsonWebToken. The most recent version (9.0) hasn't changed it as indicated here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.aspnetcore.authentication.openidconnect.tokenvalidatedcontext.securitytoken?view=aspnetcore-9.0#microsoft-aspnetcore-authentication-openidconnect-tokenvalidatedcontext-securitytoken

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/compatibility/aspnet-core/8.0/securitytoken-events

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/core/compatibility/aspnet-core/8.0/securitytoken-events.md

Document Version Independent Id

064108c4-238d-f459-29d0-cda789d1d619

Article author

@CamSoper

Metadata

  • ID: ee556bfa-702d-448b-32fe-144e43f02259
  • Service: dotnet-fundamentals

Related Issues


Associated WorkItem - 402698

@CamSoper
Copy link
Contributor

CamSoper commented Jan 7, 2025

@gewarren What's the resolution here? Remove the article?

@CamSoper CamSoper removed the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Jan 7, 2025
@gewarren
Copy link
Contributor Author

gewarren commented Jan 8, 2025

@jmprieur Can you comment on this issue? The original breaking change announcement is here: aspnet/Announcements#508.

@BillWagner BillWagner removed the Pri2 label Jan 22, 2025
@CamSoper CamSoper added the okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. label Mar 5, 2025
@dotnetrepoman dotnetrepoman bot added the 🗺️ mapQUEST Only used as a way to mark an issue as updated for quest. RepoMan should instantly remove it. label Mar 5, 2025
@CamSoper CamSoper added the 🗺️ reQUEST Triggers an issue to be imported into Quest. label Mar 5, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the 🗺️ mapQUEST Only used as a way to mark an issue as updated for quest. RepoMan should instantly remove it. label Mar 5, 2025
@sequestor sequestor bot added 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. and removed 🗺️ reQUEST Triggers an issue to be imported into Quest. labels Mar 5, 2025
@CamSoper CamSoper added the needs-more-info Needs more info from OP. Auto-closed after 2 weeks if no response. [org][resolution] label Mar 6, 2025
@CamSoper
Copy link
Contributor

CamSoper commented Mar 6, 2025

You there, @jmprieur?

Ring ring

@CamSoper CamSoper moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in dotnet/docs March 2025 sprint project Mar 6, 2025
@gewarren gewarren added the user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback". label Mar 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dotnet-fundamentals/svc needs-more-info Needs more info from OP. Auto-closed after 2 weeks if no response. [org][resolution] okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback".
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants