Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EF Core gap analysis based on Aspire discussions (Q&A) #2336

Open
davidfowl opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

EF Core gap analysis based on Aspire discussions (Q&A) #2336

davidfowl opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged

Comments

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

I ran some data analysis on the discussions and one of the themes was EF Core doc gaps. I asked the AI to cross reference the answered questions with the existing documentation and to do a gap analysis to figure out what might be missing. Here's a stab at the EF Core problems:

EF Core Gaps in .NET Aspire Documentation

1. EF Core Integration with Aspire (Enrich* Methods)


2. Handling Non-Standard DbContext Constructors


3. Configuring External SQL Server Instances


4. EF Core Migrations with Aspire


5. DbContext Pooling


6. Configuration of EF Core with Existing Resources

  • Discussion URL: Adding EF Core Interceptors when using Aspire Client Integration Packages
  • Answer Comment URL: Answer
  • Suggested Document: "EF Core Advanced Integration with Aspire" (New Document)
  • Gap:
    • Missing detailed examples for combining Aspire’s Enrich* methods with existing EF Core configurations like dynamic connection strings or advanced scenarios.
  • Suggested Update:
    • Create a new section dedicated to advanced EF Core integration, focusing on:
      • Handling external databases.
      • Combining Aspire’s configurations with user-defined settings.

@dotnetrepoman dotnetrepoman bot added the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant