Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can we avoid using (s) for things that can be multiple? #1274

Open
jskeet opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1292
Open

Can we avoid using (s) for things that can be multiple? #1274

jskeet opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1292
Assignees
@jskeet
Labels
type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing

Comments

@jskeet
Copy link
Contributor

jskeet commented Feb 19, 2025

Example from #605:

value(s) of the expression(s)

I think it would be simpler to accept that sometimes when there's a list of things, that might be a list of only one thing.

@jskeet to find all occurrences.
@jskeet jskeet added the type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing label Feb 19, 2025
@jskeet jskeet self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
jskeet added a commit to jskeet/csharpstandard that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2025
@jskeet
Remove (s) in favor of just s
1213c1d 
Fixes dotnet#1274
@jskeet jskeet linked a pull request Mar 19, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jskeet jskeet

Labels
type: clarity While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Remove (s) in favor of just s jskeet/csharpstandard
1 participant
@jskeet