Create/Update V9 Feature Tracker Status (#976)

* Add files via upload

* Update v9-feature-tracker.md

* Update v9-feature-tracker.md

Author: RexJaeschke

admin/v9-feature-tracker.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+## V9 Feature List and Current Status
+
+This file identifies the known V9 features, and tracks their status.
+
+Dependencies between feature specs are noted. The *Effort* column is an attempt to show the size/complexity of the proposal, such as *small*, *medium*, or *large*, allowing TG2 to pick-and-chose the ones they'll work on next.
+
+Rex started with a set of [MS proposals](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/tree/main/proposals/csharp-9.0). He wrote tests, looked at MS (and other) tutorial pages. **It is quite possible that not everything in any given MS proposal was in fact implemented in that version, and it is also possible that things implemented in a version later on were not spec'd back into the proposal.** 
+
+[Any work done by Rex that has not yet been turned into a Draft PR is stored in a Dropbox folder to which Bill, Mads, and Jon have access.]
+
+Feature | PR | Status | Effort | Annotation | Notes
+------- | -- | ------ | ------ | ---------- | ------
+Init accessors ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/init.md))         | [978](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/978) | SPEC'D | medium | Done | 
+Top-level statements ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/top-level-statements.md))	| [980](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/980) | SPEC'D |  small | Done | 
+Native sized integers ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/native-integers.md))	| | ?? SPEC'D | medium | Done | **Not ready for prime time!**
+Records ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/records.md))	| [983](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/983) | SPEC'D | large | Done | See open issues in the PR intro
+Function pointers ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/function-pointers.md))	| [984](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/984) | Almost complete | large | Done | See open issues in the PR intro
+Pattern matching enhancements ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/patterns3.md))	| [1026](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/1026) | SPEC'D | medium | Done | Might need tweaking after V8 pattern-matching additions merged + open issues addressed
+Suppress emitting localsinit flag ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/skip-localsinit.md))	| | N/A | | | **This is explicitly a compiler feature and not a language feature**
+static anonymous functions ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/static-anonymous-functions.md))	| [988](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/988) | SPEC'D | small | N/A |
+Target-typed conditional expressions ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/target-typed-conditional-expression.md))	| | In-progress | small | N/A | deferred for now
+Covariant return types ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/covariant-returns.md))	| | partially SPEC'D |  small | | waiting on adoption of V8 "impl. in interfaces"
+Extension GetEnumerator support for foreach loops ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/extension-getenumerator.md))	| [989](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/989)| SPEC'D | small | N/A | 
+Lambda discard parameters ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/lambda-discard-parameters.md))	| [995](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/995) | SPEC'D | small | N/A | 
+Attributes and extern on local functions ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/local-function-attributes.md))	| [994](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/994)| SPEC'D | small | Done | 
+Module initializers ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/module-initializers.md))	| [992](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/992)| SPEC'D | small | Done |
+New features for partial methods ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/extending-partial-methods.md))	| [991](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/991) | SPEC'D | small | Done | 
+Target-typed new expressions ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/target-typed-new.md))	| [990](https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/pull/990) | SPEC'D | small | N/A |
+Unconstrained type parameter annotations ([MS Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/main/proposals/csharp-9.0/unconstrained-type-parameter-annotations.md))	| | PENDING | small | | Wait to write this up until all the nullable reference and notnull constraint additions have been completed in V8