Hi. I maintain ScopeTrail, a free local-only GitHub Action that reviews pull requests for risky AI-agent permission/config drift across files like .mcp.json, Claude Code settings, Codex config, and Cursor/VS Code/Windsurf MCP config.This repo looks like a strong real-world pilot candidate because the README documents Claude Code bypassPermissions, Gemini --yolo, and MCP setup through .mcp.json.sample. That is exactly the kind of agent-permission drift ScopeTrail is meant to make visible during PR review.Would you be open to trying ScopeTrail in advisory mode for 3-5 PRs and reporting whether the warnings are useful, noisy, or missing an agent config surface? I am especially interested in whether sample MCP config such as .mcp.json.sample should be surfaced differently from active .mcp.json drift.Recommended trial setup:yaml- uses: Conalh/ScopeTrail@v0.1.11 with: fail-on: noneLinks:- Pilot guide: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/blob/main/docs/PILOT.md- Trust docs: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/blob/main/docs/TRUST.md- Pilot intake / feedback thread: Conalh/ScopeTrail#18 Structured pilot result form: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/issues/new?template=pilot-result.ymlNo PR from me unless you ask for one. If this is not useful for the repo, closing this issue is fine.
Hi. I maintain ScopeTrail, a free local-only GitHub Action that reviews pull requests for risky AI-agent permission/config drift across files like
.mcp.json, Claude Code settings, Codex config, and Cursor/VS Code/Windsurf MCP config.This repo looks like a strong real-world pilot candidate because the README documents Claude CodebypassPermissions, Gemini--yolo, and MCP setup through.mcp.json.sample. That is exactly the kind of agent-permission drift ScopeTrail is meant to make visible during PR review.Would you be open to trying ScopeTrail in advisory mode for 3-5 PRs and reporting whether the warnings are useful, noisy, or missing an agent config surface? I am especially interested in whether sample MCP config such as.mcp.json.sampleshould be surfaced differently from active.mcp.jsondrift.Recommended trial setup:yaml- uses: Conalh/ScopeTrail@v0.1.11 with: fail-on: noneLinks:- Pilot guide: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/blob/main/docs/PILOT.md- Trust docs: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/blob/main/docs/TRUST.md- Pilot intake / feedback thread: Conalh/ScopeTrail#18 Structured pilot result form: https://github.com/Conalh/ScopeTrail/issues/new?template=pilot-result.ymlNo PR from me unless you ask for one. If this is not useful for the repo, closing this issue is fine.