stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
none |
unassigned |
To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
This tutorial walks you through the creation of end-to-end (e2e) tests for GitLab Community Edition and GitLab Enterprise Edition.
By the end of this tutorial, you can:
- Determine whether an end-to-end test is needed.
- Understand the directory structure within
qa/
. - Write a basic end-to-end test that validates login features.
- Develop any missing page object libraries.
Before you write tests, your GitLab Development Kit (GDK) must be configured to run the specs. The end-to-end tests:
- Are contained within the
qa/
directory. - Should be independent and idempotent.
- Create resources (such as project, issue, user) on an ad-hoc basis.
- Test the UI and API interfaces, and use the API to efficiently set up the UI tests.
NOTE: For more information, see End-to-end testing Best Practices.
Check the code coverage of a specific feature before writing end-to-end tests for the GitLab project. Does sufficient test coverage exist at the unit, feature, or integration levels? If you answered yes, then you don't need an end-to-end test.
For information about the distribution of tests per level in GitLab, see Testing Levels.
- See the How to test at the correct level? section of the Testing levels document.
- Review how often the feature changes. Stable features that don't change very often might not be worth covering with end-to-end tests if they are already covered in lower level tests.
- Finally, discuss the proposed test with the developers involved in implementing the feature and the lower-level tests.
WARNING: Check the GitLab coverage project for previously written tests for this feature. To analyze code coverage, you must understand which application files implement specific features.
In this tutorial we're writing a login end-to-end test, even though it has been sufficiently covered by lower-level testing, because it's the first step for most end-to-end flows, and is easiest to understand.
The GitLab QA end-to-end tests are organized by the different stages in the DevOps lifecycle. Determine where the test should be placed by stage, determine which feature the test belongs to, and then place it in a subdirectory under the stage.
If the test is Enterprise Edition only, the test is created in the features/ee
directory, but follow the same DevOps lifecycle format.
In the first part of this tutorial we are testing login, which is owned by the
Manage stage. Inside qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login
, create a
file basic_login_spec.rb
.
See the RSpec.describe
outer block
WARNING:
The outer context
was deprecated in 13.2
in adherence to RSpec 4.0 specifications. Use RSpec.describe
instead.
Specs have an outer RSpec.describe
indicating the DevOps stage.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
end
end
Inside of our outer RSpec.describe
, describe the feature to test. In this case, Login
.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login' do
end
end
end
Assign product_group
metadata and specify what product group this test belongs to. In this case, authentication_and_authorization
.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login', product_group: :authentication_and_authorization do
end
end
end
Every test suite contains at least one it
block (example). A good way to start
writing end-to-end tests is to write test case descriptions as it
blocks:
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login', product_group: :authentication_and_authorization do
it 'can login' do
end
it 'can logout' do
end
end
end
end
An important question is "What do we test?" and even more importantly, "How do we test?"
Begin by logging in.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login', product_group: :authentication_and_authorization do
it 'can login' do
Flow::Login.sign_in
end
it 'can logout' do
Flow::Login.sign_in
end
end
end
end
After running the spec, our test should login and end; then we should answer the question "What do we test?"
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login', product_group: :authentication_and_authorization do
it 'can login' do
Flow::Login.sign_in
Page::Main::Menu.perform do |menu|
expect(menu).to be_signed_in
end
end
it 'can logout' do
Flow::Login.sign_in
Page::Main::Menu.perform do |menu|
menu.sign_out
expect(menu).not_to be_signed_in
end
end
end
end
end
What do we test?
- Can we sign in?
- Can we sign out?
How do we test?
- Check if the user avatar appears in the left sidebar.
- Check if the user avatar does not appear in the left sidebar.
Behind the scenes, be_signed_in
is a
predicate matcher
that implements checking the user avatar.
Refactor your test to use a before
block for test setup, since it's duplicating
a call to sign_in
.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Manage' do
describe 'Login', product_group: :authentication_and_authorization do
before do
Flow::Login.sign_in
end
it 'can login' do
Page::Main::Menu.perform do |menu|
expect(menu).to be_signed_in
end
end
it 'can logout' do
Page::Main::Menu.perform do |menu|
menu.sign_out
expect(menu).not_to be_signed_in
end
end
end
end
end
The before
block is essentially a before(:each)
and is run before each example,
ensuring we now sign in at the beginning of each test.
Next, let's test something other than Login. Let's test Issues, which are owned by the Plan
stage and the Project Management Group, so create a file in
qa/specs/features/browser_ui/2_plan/issue
called issues_spec.rb
.
# frozen_string_literal: true
module QA
RSpec.describe 'Plan' do
describe 'Issues', product_group: :project_management do
let(:issue) { create(:issue) }
before do
Flow::Login.sign_in
issue.visit!
end
it 'can close an issue' do
Page::Project::Issue::Show.perform do |show|
show.click_close_issue_button
expect(show).to be_closed
end
end
end
end
end
Note the following important points:
- At the start of our example, we are at the
page/issue/show.rb
page. - Our test fabricates only what it needs, when it needs it.
- The issue is fabricated through the API to save time.
- GitLab prefers
let()
over instance variables. See best practices. be_closed
is not implemented inpage/project/issue/show.rb
yet, but is implemented in the next step.
The issue is fabricated as a Resource, which is a GitLab entity you can create through the UI or API. Other examples include:
- A Merge Request.
- A User.
- A Project.
- A Group.
A Page Object is a class in our suite that represents a page
within GitLab. The Login page would be one example. Since our page object for
the Issue Show page already exists, add the closed?
method.
module Page::Project::Issue
class Show
view 'app/views/projects/issues/show.html.haml' do
element :closed_status_box
end
def closed?
has_element?(:closed_status_box)
end
end
end
Next, define the element closed_status_box
within your view, so your Page Object
can see it.
-#=> app/views/projects/issues/show.html.haml
.issuable-status-box.status-box.status-box-issue-closed{ ..., data: { qa_selector: 'closed_status_box' } }
Before running the spec, make sure that:
- GDK is installed.
- GDK is running locally on port 3000.
- No additional RSpec metadata tags have been applied.
- Your working directory is
qa/
within your GDK GitLab installation. - Your GitLab instance-level settings are default. If you changed the default settings, some tests might have unexpected results.
- Because the GDK requires a password change on first login, you must include the GDK password for
root
user
To run the spec, run the following command:
GITLAB_PASSWORD=<GDK root password> bundle exec rspec <test_file>
Where <test_file>
is:
qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb
when running the Login example.qa/specs/features/browser_ui/2_plan/issue/create_issue_spec.rb
when running the Issue example.
Additional information on test execution and possible options are described in "QA framework README"
When submitting a new end-to-end test, use the "New End to End Test" merge request description template for additional steps that are required prior a successful merge.