Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Constraints file for key dependencies in the dbt ecosystem of packages #161

Closed
3 tasks done
colin-rogers-dbt opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale triage

Comments

@colin-rogers-dbt
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this your first time submitting a feature request?

  • I have read the expectations for open source contributors
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this feature
  • I am requesting a straightforward extension of existing dbt functionality, rather than a Big Idea better suited to a discussion

Describe the feature

All dbt-* components (i.e. core, plugins, adapters, dbt-extractor etc.) exist in the same python environment, sharing the same dependencies. This means that in order for someone to install and run these in the same virtual environment we need to be able to have compatible dependencies. It also means the developers of dbt components should choose dependency ranges that are going to be compatible with the broader ecosystem without knowing what those ranges should be ahead of time.

To solve this we could maintain a common package dependencies constraints file which we suggest package maintainers adhere to (or at least test compatibility against). Some examples of packages that would be helpful to include: Pydantic, mashumaro, json-schema, agate, numpy.
Note these aren't necessarily direct dependencies of dbt-core, dbt-common or dbt-adapters but common dependencies used by adapters and plugins.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Who will this benefit?

No response

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

No response

Anything else?

No response

@colin-rogers-dbt colin-rogers-dbt added enhancement New feature or request triage labels Jul 3, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been marked as Stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. If you would like the issue to remain open, please comment on the issue or else it will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 31, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Although we are closing this issue as stale, it's not gone forever. Issues can be reopened if there is renewed community interest. Just add a comment to notify the maintainers.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale triage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant